Home
malcanada [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
malcanada

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Email to Etal: Eye specialist stuff; 2 appts.w/entrapment this week [Nov. 29th, 2009|04:41 pm]

----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: Email to Etal
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 4:26 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Eye specialist stuff; 2 appts. w/entrapment this week


We had one non-rainy day with some sun this week, and I was able to sweep and bag the dead leaves on the patio. I even pruned the rose bush and moved some of the plant containers around, but since the optometrist told me not to unnecessarily exert myself, I didn't attempt the wholesale repositioning which I want to do.

It was a quiet week because I don't feel well. The red-skin, raises pulse & blood pressure noxious inhalant is filling my apartment all the time now. It used to appear in the early hours of the morning and in evenings, but now I am bathed in it continuously. It is heavy here at the computer, so I will not write a long email today. Obviously the inhalant contains a vaso-dilator, which probably caused my retinal aneurism. What other damage is it doing to my body and my brain? What is the purpose of the RCMP in using it - are they simply trying to cause a stroke or a heart attack? Will blindness satisfy them?

The other night as I was drifting off to sleep after meditating, my thoughts and feelings were suddenly reorganized about the stranger (I described him as a charmless apprentice) whom the retinal specialist, Dr. Xxxxxx, allowed to look into my eye. At the hospital appointment with the specialist on November 16th, I was left sitting in the corridor several times between the overdose by the technician and different facets of the examinations. I was there for hours. I guess police were waiting for the overdose to cause me to collapse or to act bizarrely. That man (short, thin, blondish, nasty-looking) walked by me on several occasions and each time the hair on my neck stood up. I thought he looked familiar, but I didn't know why I found him threatening. At no time did he seem to be accompanying the retinal specialist in exam rooms or with patients.

I don't know exactly where I've seen that man before, but it was in a medical situation. When I used to try to find a physician's care for myself and attended four walk-in clinics, a hospital emergency, and Dr. Bxxxxxx's office, the same two plainclothes policewomen always showed up. They talked to the doctors before I was seen, and they were still in the offices when I left. For some reason I associate that man with those two policewomen, and I think that he too is a cop. I don't know what medical qualifications these police who interfere with doctors have, but they must have some. Always they told the physicians that I am a crazy malingerer.

The red-skin, vaso-dilator noxious inhalant, when it's at its worst, effects a kind of shimmering in my vision. Perhaps police thought that's what I was complaining about. Maybe they told the eye specialist the malingerer story, and he had that policeman look into my eye to see that there was a real problem. But will they allow him to treat me? The optometrist had told me that the specialist would immediately order a blood panel and take my blood pressure, and that those things would be done right there at our first appointment at the hospital. Of course he did not do so, and when I called his office days later to say that I definitely have hypertension (which he thought caused the aneurism) he refused to prescribe blood pressure medication for me.

Do you realize that there must be physicians working for the RCMP who design the noxious inhalants and other dirty tricks, and that they write the scripts for interfering with the medical care of people who are being abused by the police? I bet you thought that Dr. Mengele was dead.

I absolutely expect that there will be entrapment attempts on Tuesday and Wednesday, first at the retinal specialist's office, and then at the office of the family doctor, Dr. Xxxxx, I will see for the first time (I will try the general practitioner because I need a diagnostic mammogram and he could be a backup for hypertension medication if police allow it). I will be my usual calm self and not be annoyed or alarmed by anything. Of course it would be better not to have to put myself into those situations, but I feel that I have no choice.

If I do not see the eye specialist after he told me how serious my condition is, police may be able to say sometime in the future that I am a danger to myself. The ultimate question is, of course, will the physician violate his professional ethics in order to please police? I think his refusing to prescribe high blood pressure medication was an attempt by police to drive me away and to make me unwisely ignore the retinal aneurism. Will the eye specialist still refuse to prescribe for me at our second appointment? Will I be overdosed again? Will police prevent him from treating my eye properly?

I sent that fax of November 25th to the retinal specialist because he did need a medical history for me, but also as a kind of insurance that I won't again be dosed with some substance which interferes with my vision and makes me sick for three days - or with any other poison. Who knows if the fax will work. I don't know how difficult it would be to switch to another eye specialist, but if it were allowed by the medical plan, the police would simply visit the same lies about me to the new guy, and I would be no better off and starting over again. So I'll keep Tuesday's appointment and see what happens.

Did you notice in my previous email that one of the eye drop preparations used to dilate the pupil, isopto hyoscine, is scopolomine? During the 1950's, scopolomine was the CIA's widely used "truth serum". Those various kinds of eye drops are not benign, but often have serious psychological and physical effects - which is what police hoped for, of course, when I was overdosed.

The red-skin noxious inhalant is precipitating a full-blown twelve to sixteen hour migraine headache at least once a week. At least I hope they are migraines and not small strokes caused by the inhalant. They are awful.

After all this time, my computer is still trying to run scans on C and D drives, FAT32 and NTFS, as soon as I turn it on, even before my screen saver password. I prevent it every time I turn on the machine because I fear that it will either erase sections of my hard drive or add incriminating material to the hard drive. If police seize me, as soon as someone turns on the computer, those scans will run and do their evil.

Yesterday was the birthday of my younger brother who was carried off by melanoma. I lit a candle in front of his photo, and afterwards I thought about my cultural Catholicism. I'm not religious in any normal sense of the word (meditation and communing with nature seem to fill that need for me; and ethics have to do with character, not punishment and arbitrary rules) but I love Church music, art, Latin, candles, incense, and ritual. If masses were still said in Latin, I'd probably attend. I tried to join a R.C. church in 2001 because I wanted to sing in the choir but police were there spreading their poison and a eucharistic minister drove me away. When I was little my father sang in the choir and was president of the Holy Name Society in a large NYC parish (I remember seeing him singing Gregorian Chant on WPIX TV) and I think he took me to church a lot. Christmas was always magical. Well, you know the old Jesuit adage.

I am looking forward to Christmas here, and I already have lobster meat and oysters in my freezer for Christmas Eve. Last week I cooked mussels (moules meunieres) which were delicious. I will put up my Christmas tree and creche in the middle of December. Last year Siamese Mike enjoyed repeatedly removing all the tree decorations he could reach. Louie-Louie is more blase' about the holidays.

Please save my journal. Wish me luck.
Link

Email to Etal: Fax to eye specialist [Nov. 25th, 2009|05:53 pm]
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 5:38 PM
Subject: Fax to eye specialist [fax confirmed sent at 5:30 PM]

_____________________________________
November 25, 2009
Dr. Xxxxx Xxxxxx
xxxx Xxxxxx Street
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
By Fax: xxx - xxx - xxxx


Dr. Xxxxxx:

Since you had no medical history for me at our first appointment, I am faxing you a fact sheet with all information about my health dating back to childhood, and including family health history. I hope it will assist you in treating the retinal aneurysm in my right eye.

As well I want to tell you about an unfortunate outcome of my first visit with you at Xx. Xxxx’s Hospital on November 16, 2009. On many occasions, optometrists and ophthalmologists have administered drops to dilate my pupils during eye examinations. The most recent occasion was on November 10th at Xx. Xxxxxxxx Optometry, when Dr. Xxx Xxx referred me to your care. The effect of those dilating eye drops always dissipated within four hours. At the Xx. Xxxx’s Hospital Eye Clinic on Monday, the 16th , a female technician tested my vision, used eye drops to dilate my pupils, and then took digital photographs of my retinas. These were the same procedures carried out at Xx. Xxxxxxxx Optometry on November 10th.

But at Xx. Xxxx’s, I immediately became photophobic, felt slightly unwell, and had poor equilibrium when I moved from sitting to standing. Different hospital personnel then performed a fluorescein angiogram without administering any further dilating eye drops. After speaking with you, I took a taxi home and expected to feel better in a few hours. In fact, the extreme dilation of my pupils, the photophobia, and the unwell feeling continued for more than sixty hours. Also, I was unable to drive my car. It was not until Thursday morning, the 19th, that my eyes felt and looked normal and that I recovered from the malaise. It was a most uncomfortable experience and I hope that it will never happen to me again.

I have been monitoring my blood pressure as you directed. On November 17th, it was 176/81. On November 20th, it was 182/90. On November 23rd, the reading was 179/89. I phoned your office on November 18th and asked for a prescription for high blood pressure medication. No one called me back, so on the 19th I again phoned and repeated the request. At 4:45 pm on November 19th, a woman left a message on my answering machine that: “Dr. Xxxxxx can’t prescribe blood pressure medication for you as he is an eye doctor”. I have been using the Prednisolone and Nevanac eye drops you prescribed at our first appointment, but I wonder if they can be effective in treating the retinal aneurysm when my blood pressure is so high.

I look forward to our next appointment on December 1st. I am, of course, concerned about the deteriorated vision in my right eye and about the possibility that it might worsen. I hope my early discovery of the problem and your able treatment of it will return my vision to its former level of acuity.

Sincerely,

xxxxx

Link

Look what was supposed to happen to me! This is truly disgusting. [Nov. 20th, 2009|03:51 pm]

----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 3:39 PM
Subject: Look what was supposed to happen to me! This is truly disgusting.


Look what an overdose of the opthalmic eye dilation drops was supposed to do to me!


Police expected to be able to keep me in at Xx. Xxxx's hospital on Monday after giving me an overdose of medication that lasted for sixty hours. They would have certified me mentally ill.


No wonder the nurse in the fluorescein angiogram room was afraid I would have a nasty reaction.


I don't know which brand of dilation eye drops was used.
Tropicamide is sold as: I-Picamide; Minims Tropicamide; Mydriacyl; Mydriafair;
Mydriaticum; Ocu-Tropic; Opticyl; Paremyd; Spectro-Cyl; Tropicacyl. Phenylephrine Ophthalmic is sold as: AK-Dilate, AK-Nefrin, Isopto Frin, Mydfrin, Neo-Synephrine Ophthalmic, Neofrin. Atropine is sometimes used, as is Isopto Hyoscine (scopolomine).


All of them carry the warning to attend an emergency room or to contact a poison control center for the more serious symptoms, and to call a doctor for the less serious ones. Here's a sample list:

Severe allergic reactions (rash; hives; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue); chest pain; confusion; excitability; fainting; fast, slow, or irregular heartbeat; vison problems; tremor; drowsiness; sweating; numbness of an arm or leg; one-sided weakness; severe or persistent headache; severe stomach pain; sudden severe dizziness, fainting, or vomiting; vision or speech changes; dryness in the mouth; dehydrated or sensitive skin; pain in the eyes; rise in body temperature; complications with urination; distended abdomen; loss of balance; hallucinations.

The RCMP expected that I would not be able to carry on and to behave normally after that overdose of dilation eye drops. They expected that I could be hospitalized that day and kept in their clutches. If I had succumbed to the overdose, the police would have had me certified by now. On Tuesday, that plainclothes policeman was following me, still in the hope, that I would collapse and could be carted off in an ambulance.

How could medical people be so evil, immoral, and disgusting? How can I ever trust any physician or hospital to treat my medical problems? What about my eye? Will I be deprived of my sight? When I attend Dr. Xxxxxx's office on December 1st, will I once again be poisoned at police request?

How could this happen in Canada? It's like something out of a novel about the USSR or Nazi Germany. Doesn't anyone care that this could go on?

If they can do this to me simply because I caught local police and the City carrying on illegal surveillance, what are the RCMP doing to other people?

Aren't you all afraid that someday it will be your turn?

Aren't you ashamed?




[Note to Journal Readers: The Etal Group contains the director of the provincial Civil Liberties Association, lawyers, and a rep at another legal justice group. No group, no person is willing to help me.]


Link

"Can't Rx for you as he is an eye doctor." [Nov. 19th, 2009|05:59 pm]

At 4:45 pm, after I had posted today's Email to Etal in this journal, a young woman left a message on my answering machine in a loud chirpy voice.

After identifying herself as an employee of the retina specialist opthalmologist, and saying that she was responding to my request for a prescription, she said that the doctor suggests that I call my family doctor or attend a walk-in clinic.

She added, "He can not prescribe blood pressure medication for you as he is an eye doctor".

She said I could call the office if I have any questions.

Do I really need to comment on this? It's all in the email below.


Link

Email to Etal: Retinal aneurism; Dr refuses Rx for high B/P [Nov. 19th, 2009|04:18 pm]
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:54 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Retinal aneurism; Dr refuses Rx for high B/P
 
 
 
Let me tell you about Monday's appointment at Xx. Xxxxx's Hospital with the retinal specialist and hospital staff and you can draw your own conclusions about RCMP interference.
 
I arrived by taxi and was seen promptly at 9:15.  A large woman in her fifties, who was possibly wearing a wig, dealt with me first.  I made a few social comments to her and she responded appropriately, but she never made eye contact with me.  She repeated all the tests that the optometrist's office had performed.  I asked why and she said they had not received any information from Dr. Xxx.  I did not believe her because she was holding a folder full of material.  Dr. Xxx's office had taken two sets of photographs of my retinas.  This woman said she didn't have them and used drops in my eyes to dilate my pupils, but then she seemed to take the photos too quickly and too carelessly.  She made paper copies and tore them from the machine.  Then she raced off the eye clinic floor, and I did not see her again although I was there for another hour and a half.
 
My pupils were so dilated that I was extremely photophobic and I really couldn't see anything.  I even  kept losing my equilibrium when I went from sitting to standing.  Normally the dilation disappears within four hours.  My eyes were completely dilated for sixty hours until bedtime on Wednesday night.  Today is the first day that my pupils are normal.
 
After a wait, a nurse approached me pleasantly.  She checked my eyes and said that I would not need further dilation for a fluorescein angiogram.  She asked me about allergies.  Then we went into an examining room.  While the nurse was placing an IV in my wrist, I told her about my problems with IV's during the XGH gall bladder debacle.  She said that nurses  are professionals with ethics (implying that the XGH IV nurse was not) and I wondered if she were also distancing herself from other staff members at Xx. Xxxxx's.  In general, she too treated me as though I were an exotic animal (like the gaggle of interns at XGH), but she seemed genuinely nice.  She sat next to me in case I had an allergic reaction to the intravenous dye.  My skin became yellow for a while, and for 24 hours my urine was Day-Glo yellow.  A female technician took specialized digital photographs of my retinas.  She seemed calm and efficient, and when I asked her a question about the process, she answered me as though I were capable of understanding.
 
Next, in another room, I was seen by Dr. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, vitreo-retinal surgeon.  He is a young, slight man with an inexpressive face, and he said very little to me.  He told me that I have a retinal aneurism that could lead to loss of sight.  He said he would first attempt treatment with eye drops, then an injection into the eye, then a laser, and that surgery is a last resort.  He told me to make an appointment two weeks away.  He did not order any laboratory tests or even take my blood pressure, although he said that aneurisms are usually associated with high blood pressure.  He suggested that I take my blood pressure at drugstore machines five times in the next two weeks and tell him the readings at our next appointment.   He gave me a prescription for eye drops.  He said that I may have had this condition for months and hadn't realized it.  No, that's not true.  I am acutely aware of my body, and as soon as my vision in my right eye became so badly impaired, I knew.
 
Before I left, he brought in an apprentice to look into my eye.  I did not object, but later I was sorry that I hadn't refused.  The intern, or whatever he was, never acknowledged me as a living person, no "Hi", or half smile, no eye contact.  He stared through an eye piece and discussed me with Dr. Xxxxxx as though I were an exhibit in formaldehyde.  What a charming medical specialist he will be.
 
My vision was so impaired by the pupil dilation, that I had a hard time finding my way out of the hospital.  It's a big old place, with a new large building attached.  I also felt vaguely sick.  I emerged in the pouring rain on a street I didn't recognize with my impaired sight.  There were lights a block away, so I headed to them.   It wasn't until I was inside that I realized that it was a Starbuck's.  I bought a $2.25 low-fat muffin and asked the clerk to phone a taxi.  On the ride home, I had no idea, because of my poor vision, where the cab driver was going although I know city streets well.
 
The next morning, I phoned Dr. Xxxxxx's office and made the two week appointment for Tuesday, Dec. 1.  Then I phoned the office of a family doctor who is on vacation now, but will accept a few new patients when he returns, Dr. Axxxxxx Xxxx on Xxxxxx Street.  I have an appointment with him on Dec. 2nd.  I know that the RCMP will contact Dr. Xxxx with hateful stories about me before I ever see him, and that they may even listen in during my visits with him, and give him instructions, as they used to do with Dr. Exxxxx Xxxxxxxx.
 
On Tuesday, even though I still couldn't see properly and should not have been driving, I had to have the prescriptions filled.  I went to Kxxxxxxxx Mall, although security guards harass me there, because it contains a huge Xxxxxxxx Drug Mart and I wanted to buy a blood pressure monitor.  They had one machine that fits on the wrist, but it didn't work, so I couldn't purchase one (I bought my mother a monitor which fits on the finger and she used it for ten years, but they don't seem to be sold any more).  The Rx's were for two kinds of eye drops, Prednisolone (steroid) and Nevanac (non-steroid anti-inflammatory).  They cost $55 and the taxis on Monday were $40. 
 
While at the drug store, I took my blood pressure.  It was 176/81.  That's bad news because, although I know that it is elevated at home during times I breathe the noxious inhalant, it is generally normal when I am out.  Whenever I go to Safeway or any of the big drugstores I take my B/P and it is relatively okay.  I also am careful of my diet and use very little salt (I eat low-fat meals, too, although I probably ruin that by having cake or cookies in the evening).
 
For the last ten or twelve days the red-skin, elevated pulse & blood pressure noxious inhalant fills my apartment from 4am until I get up.  When I wake, my skin is bright red and my face, hands, and feet are throbbing.  Do you know that the time of greatest danger of a heart attack is 8 am?  The protective hormone in our bodies is at it's lowest ebb then.  The inhalant is around at other times too, and it's especially strong in the bathroom, but that early morning stuff is the worst.  But now that drugstore B/P reading means that my blood pressure is elevated all the time, not just when I'm breathing poison at home.  The RCMP may actually succeed in killing me.
 
Yesterday morning I woke with the high B/P symptoms and an awful migraine.  Around 10 am I called Dr. Xxxxxx's [eye specialist] office and asked the receptionist if I could have a phoned prescription for blood pressure medication.  She gave me a hard time and kept telling me to go to my family doctor, although I said several times that I don't have one.  Finally she agreed that she would call me back.  She didn't.  This morning I once again phoned Xxxxxx's office and asked for a prescription, with the same result.  I actually don't expect that anyone will call me back today either.
 
Can you believe that a physician who told me that I have a retinal aneurism and could lose my sight, and also told me that it is probably caused by high blood pressure, would not test my blood pressure or have blood tests done?  That the very same physician would refuse to prescribe medication for me when I left two messages at his office that my blood pressure is 176/81 ?   That he would send me away for two weeks with high blood pressure?  How could the Prednisolone and Nevanac drops heal my eye when the cause of the aneurism is allowed to remain unchecked?
 
I'd be willing to bet that the police have assured all those people at Monday's hospital appointment that I will disappear before two weeks is up.  Obviously over-dilating my eyes like that was supposed to get me to argue with someone at the doctor's office or the hospital.  I decided not to mention it.  (Perhaps police hoped that I would attend hospital emergency.)  It's the same with my phoned requests for a blood pressure medication.  The office will never phone me back in the hope that I will place a nasty or threatening call to them.  I won't call them anymore.
 
Getting a prescription may not be the answer anyway.  I stopped going to walk-in clinics for beta blocker prescriptions (40 mg. of propranolol twice a day) to ameliorate my migraines because the police simply interfered at the pharmacy level (Xxxxway, Axxxxxx Pharmacy, etc.) and substituted placebos.  The RCMP didn't want me have propranolol because it kept my blood pressure and pulse low and interfered with the red-skin noxious inhalant.  They'd do the same thing again now.  And if the new G.P., Dr. Xxxx, orders lab tests or writes prescriptions, the police will interfere with those, too.  As, I wrote above, the RCMP and local police just might succeed in killing me.  Certainly they've demonstrated that they can blind me.
 
I was sick all day yesterday and last night with a migraine headache.  I still don't feel well today.  Tuesday when I left this building, a vehicle pulled up behind mine on the street and a man got out and loitered around my car.  I recognized him as a plainclothes policeman, but I smiled and said hi as though I thought he were a neighbor.  Then he followed me to the mall.  Was he waiting for me to collapse?
 
Even if I feel good tomorrow, I will not go out to buy a blood pressure monitor because Friday and the weekends are always days of maximum police entrapment attempts.  I'll wait until next week to try to buy one.
 
Every morning when I get up, whether it's 7 or 8 or 9 am, the Xx's in 30x above me throw gallons of water down, in three or four places, on my patio and plants.  You should hear the noise it makes.  No other balcony in the building has a problem with water collecting on it.  I always have an allergy attack (which probably isn't a coincidence) then, to add to my red-skin, throbbing face, hands, & feet, and elevated pulse and blood pressure. 
 
The wind storms we've had lately have prematurely denuded the tree by the back door.  Unfortunately, all of the leaves are now on my patio.  It keeps raining every day, so I haven't been able to sweep them up.  My poor plants were all blown over several times and sustained some damage.  The cats seem upset lately, and Siamese Mike is sticking closer to home.  Last night, with that dreadful migraine, I slept on the sofa and most of the night both Mike and Louie-Louie were piled on top of me, but they both took off around 4 am when the red-skin noxious inhalant started.
 
Of course, if the police do succeed in killing me or blinding me, all of the people who know what is going on here will pretend to be clueless.
 
Please save my journal.    Wish me luck.
 
 
Link

EmailToEtal: Retinal hemorrhage; to vitreo-retinal surgeon; entrapment attempts [Nov. 14th, 2009|03:51 pm]

----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 4:16 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Retinal hemorrhage; referred to vitreo-retinal surgeon


On Monday, I tried to have my eyes examined in pouring cold rain. First I went to Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Optometry (which is not far away) where I was told that the doctors were too busy to see me (although the office was tomblike) and that I would have to make an appointment for another day. Who knows if police were involved. I thought it probable that I would meet the same fate with any optometrist, so I decided to go to one of the dreaded walk-in medical clinics to ask for a referral to an eye specialist.


I drove around soaking wet and visited three clinics which used to be drop-in facilities. Now they had closed patient lists, and all of them suggested I attend one of the three medical drop-in places still existing. Unfortunately, I had been the subject of police entrapment attempts in all three of them. I decided that I would go to the one closest to home next to the XXX supermarket on Mxxx and xxth.


There are two physicians in that office, both named Hxxxx. When I had pneumonia I went there, and an older man (the father?) kept me waiting for more than an hour while he talked with police who no doubt told him I'm a crazy malingerer. Then he refused to treat me, didn't even examine me, and told me to go to hospital emergency if I didn't feel better in a few days. When I later attended Xx. Xx. Xxxxxx's emergency department, I was diagnosed with atypical pneumonia. The emergency doctor knew that Dr. Hxxxx had turned me away - I guess police told him that he should do the same thing, but he prescribed antibiotics after an x-ray. (When the police were through with him, he talked to me for quite a while in a sly attempt to assess my mental state and I guess I passed his test.)


On Monday, the younger Dr. Hxxxx (the son?) kept me waiting for an hour and a half. When I finally saw him and described my eye symptom, he didn't even look at my eyes with a light. He was an obnoxious blowhard, and he thought if he stood too close to me and talked very loudly that I would do as he said. He told me that I have a detached retina. No I don't. I had researched all eye symptoms on the internet, and detached retina was the one malady I could rule out. He said that he had had one, had attended XGH emergency, and that they performed surgery on him at once. He kept shouting at me, while grinning, that I should go to hospital immediately, insist that I had an emergency, and demand to have surgery.

Right. I can just imagine how well that would go for me after police had told hospital staff that I'm dangerously mentally ill. Especially at XGH, where they let me lie sedated in the basement for five days while my gall bladder atrophied. XGH almost killed me on the say-so of police.


I left Xxxxx's office and drove back to Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Optometry. I was given an appointment for Tuesday at 3:20. Okay, an appointment that late in the afternoon on the day before a holiday (all public operations cease on Armistice/Veterans'/Remembrance Day and police wouldn't have to take me to court the next day if they seized me) was bad news, but I felt I had no choice. Then after I got home on Monday, there was an outrageous onslaught of noxious inhalant that continued all night, and on Tuesday. By Tuesday both Louie-Louie and I were violently sick, but I kept the appointment.


I checked in with the receptionist and then I heard my name called. Sitting in the waiting room was a woman I had known when she was a young defense lawyer. I always liked her and I was glad to see her even though I knew that she was going to try to entrap me. She said she was there to have her glasses repaired. Police still think that if they make me sick or annoyed that I will go around telling people that I am being abused by them. If I had said anything like that to her, mental health emergency people with a police escort would have shown up to cart me off to the loony bin. (By the way, why is it legal to incarcerate people simply because they accuse the police of abuse or harassment?)


Like some other lawyers, she's working for the Crown (prosecution) now because diminishing legal aid funding simply makes defense work unfeasible unless one's practice is already firmly established. Xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx. I told her that I'm happy to be retired, that I read, cook, and garden. We discussed the shortcomings of the Community Court and the plight of mental patients in the system. A technician came out to fetch me for preliminary tests, but then said, "Oh, finish your conversation. I'll come back later." Right again. Everyone in that office knew what police were attempting to do to me. Anyway, despite police intent, my feeling sick from the inhalant, and my being on the verge of a migraine, I was happy to see her and I enjoyed talking to her. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxx.


(By the way, in the early days, when I still believed that there were some principled people in the legal system, I wrote to the head Crown Counsel of this area asking for help. He didn't reply, but I did receive a nasty useless reply from Mxxx Xxxx.)


The optometrist who saw me was Xxx Xxx, and she seemed smart and efficient. She showed me digital photos of my eyes, and performed a number of tests. She said that in her practice she had not before seen this damage. I do not have glaucoma, detached retina, or cataracts. The exact damage I have in my right eye is not normally seen in cases of diabetes or high blood pressure or abnormal blood viscousity, although next week I will be tested for those conditions. On the computer screen, in the larger circle depicting my retina, there is a area about the size of a quarter which is a hemorrhage. Dr. Xxx told me not to exert myself and to take it easy, and she referred me to Axxxxx Xxxxxx, vitreo-retinal surgeon and medical retina specialist. She also found scar tissue in my left retina which indicates that something had healed there. Three times she asked me if I had a recent eye injury - perhaps police told her I poke myself in the eye.


My appointment with the specialist, Dr. Xxxxxx, is Monday at 9:15 am at Xx. Xxxx's Hospital. He practices both there and at XGH. I do not feel reassured because we will meet at Xx. Xxxx's rather than XGH. Hospitals' staff in big cities are afraid of the public, and they are only too happy to co-operate with police. I am not suggesting that the specialist will not treat me properly. My eye condition seems too serious for him, or Dr. Xxx, or any physician to accept the usual word of police that I am a malingerer. But I do worry about lab tests because police have interfered with my medical lab tests in the past. I expect that the lab tests, where ever they are done, will show multiple medical problems in order to cover-up the police use of noxious inhalant. (I hope the tests will be done there that same day.) And probably there will be entrapment attempts like the one at Dr. Xxx's office. If my telephone is not sabotaged by police on Monday morning, I will phone a taxi to go to the hospital because the doctor may use eye drops which would prevent me from driving home.


The noxious inhalant which the RCMP releases into my apartment has damaged my eyes, and if you don't believe that, you haven't been paying attention to what I write in my emails and journal. The stuff which makes my skin red, raises my pulse & blood pressure, and makes me feel faint and sick is designed to cause a cardio-vascular accident - a heart attack or a stroke. It sometimes brings on a migraine attack, but not always. The police use it with impunity, and it starts and stops with the flick of a switch. So far I haven't collapsed with a CVA, but is there hidden brain damage? I wonder if police will be satisfied if they blind me and I wind up in a home for the visually impaired. This morning they used the red-skin inhalant for about an hour, and I often wake up in the middle of the night and realize that I'm breathing it.


Think about this - at least the condo council, and perhaps all of my neighbors, know what police are doing to me and they think that it's okay. And don't forget that my neighbors, on RCMP instructions, have defrauded me of around $25,000 in an attempt to render me homeless.


We're having a wind storm today and I now notice that two of my plants have blown over. The containers need to be rearranged because the sun is so low in the sky (and sunset is at 4:20 today) but I can't do it because I may exacerbate the bleeding in my retina. My rose buds won't bloom, I think, but the corn plant is hanging on. The wind has filled the patio with dead leaves.


The juvenile raccoons look like adults now. They still occasionally show up as a group and frolic on the patio. From the time they were tiny babies, and I would go out to refill the water bowl for them, I always spoke to them, "Don't spill the water again. Come on, stop pushing there. Let the littlest guy have some. Okay, you go home now. Etc." The two most outgoing juveniles eventually started to talk back to me, the way cats meow back at you. They made little snorting noises in reply when I spoke to them. Now its often cold and rainy, and the two talkers stand up against the patio door with their hands on the glass and call me with little snorts and noises. I feel terrible because I don't give them any cat food.

Today I'm making chicken soup with stellini pastina, and I'm going to have a bowl now.


Please save my journal. Wish me luck.


________________________________


Postscript for malcanada's LiveJournal:


I sent the above email yesterday, but my eyes were tired, so I shut off the computer and decided to enter it in my journal today. Then there was another entrapment attempt last night, and more terrible noxious inhalant.


Around midnight I went to bed, and lay there meditating for about an hour as I usually do. (I also meditate mornings while sitting at the bedroom window.) I heard Xxxxx-Next-Door arrive home about 12:30. I was aware that a small animal was snuffling around on the patio, probably the skunk or a lone raccoon. Then, around 1 am, Trixie (homeless half-tame, half-feral mother of my Siamese Mike who the cat rescue organization asked me to feed after they spayed and released her) began to meow outside the patio door. Mike ran to the patio door to try to go out to her.


I got up and let Mike out. Then, leaving the sliding door open, I went to the kitchen for some dry cat food in case Trixie was hungry. When I got back and poured out the food, I could see neither Trixie nor Mike, but there was a loud pounding on wood noise coming from the patio next door. (There is still a gaping hole in the fence between our patios.) My first thought was that a coyote had gotten in through the gaps in that patio fence. But then Xxxxx-Next-Door raised himself upright (he had been making the noise) and stood stock still and glared at me for a long time. I don't know if he was beating the small snuffling animal or flailing at my cats, but he had frightened Trixie. Obviously police hoped that I would react angrily, go out in my nightgown, and shout at him. I did not. I stayed in the doorway, looked back at him, and decided that I would not ask what he was doing. I called Mike and Louie (by this time Louie had blundered out on the patio,too), and Mike and Trixie appeared after a few minutes. I took the three cats into the apartment (normally Trixie chooses to stay outside) and we all went to sleep.


Then at 4 am I was awakened by someone moving stealthily directly over my head in the apartment above mine. Immediately I was awash in the noxious CVA inhalant which makes my skin red, raises my pulse & blood pressure, and I am sure, damages my eyes. It also makes me feel sick, and does the same to poor Louie-Louie who sleeps with me. That evil miasma continued until I got up this morning at 8:30. Police are determined to incapacitate me with their poisons. Louie is ill and hiding today. I suspect police have started using that stuff mostly while I am asleep because they think I won't know about it.


Please save my journal. Wish me luck.
Link

Will eye problem lead to entrapment?; Probate Court protecting security agency [Nov. 5th, 2009|04:02 pm]
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 3:58 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Will eye problem lead to entrapment?; Cop-out by Probate Court to protect security agency (letter below)

 
  
My eyes have been bothering me for some time, but that was to be expected given that my allergies have been exacerbated, I have migraine headache (with an aura) always in my right eye, and the noxious inhalant which makes my skin red causes broken capillaries on my face and has three times filled one of my eyes with blood (on the first two occasions I visited doctors who told me it would clear up and was not serious, and on the last I didn't bother).  My eyes feel sore and swollen most of the time, and I haven't been able to wear my contacts for ages.  But now I think that I can detect an area in the vision of my right eye which seems to be covered by a gray cloud, and that could be a serious symptom.  Next week I will have my eyes examined.
 
I will of course be walking into the lions' den.  The last six physicians and three dentists I have visited all provided occasions for the RCMP and local police to attempt to entrap me.  When dealing with medical people, police have used two courses of action.  The first is to tell the doctor/dentist that I am dangerously mentally ill and that I am a malingerer and should not be encouraged. 
 
So, when I developed gall bladder symptoms, I attended my physician of eight years, Dxxxx  Bxxxxx, and told him.  He said no, I didn't have a gall bladder problem and sent me away.  I had to go back a second time and insist that he order a sonogram.  It did show a problem, but once again he said it wasn't serious and put me on a waiting list for non-invasive surgery.  I got sicker and sicker, and I began to phone the surgeon's office and ask for any cancellation spot, but I was ignored.  Finally I became so sick that I couldn't stand or even sit up and I asked my son to take me to XGH hospital (I trusted him to look after my welfare).  Once there, in accordance with police instructions, I was sedated and left in a basement hallway for five days.  When doctors finally got around to me, I needed open gall bladder surgery (I have metal staples in my liver) and my heart stopped during the operation.  I woke up on a respirator, I spent twelve days in the hospital, and I was sick at home for two more weeks.
 
The second course of action police take when dealing with doctors is to interfere with my medical tests so that I will have unnecessary surgery or treatment to unsettle me, while telling doctors that I am dangerously mentally ill and should be certified.  During the end of my gall bladder hospital stay, I had some minor vaginal bleeding.  I told the group of interns who came around daily (they treated me like some exotic animal and clearly were waiting for me to act irrationally) that antibiotics cause that for me, but they insisted I visit a doctor as soon as possible for a Pap test.  When I got around to it, I attended a gynecologist in Dr. Bxxxxx's clinic. 

Then I was called in and told that the test was positive for cancer, I had to have a hysterectomy as soon as possible, and the doctor offered me an appointment two weeks away.  I had the surgery, and during my hospital stay I was abused with provocation from a nurse trying to get an unwise reaction from me.  The gynecologist also visited with me for an hour in an attempt to diagnose me as mentally ill, but I was charming.  On my follow-up visit to the doctor's office, she admitted that my tissue (she said she sent the "whole thing" for testing) had come back with a cancer-free finding.  Police had forced me to have unnecessary major surgery soon after the gall bladder debacle in the hope that I could be entrapped while in hospital.
 
Police have also interfered with a MIBI heart test, and they have prevented me from having a diagnostic mammograms.  Before my descent into police hell, annual screening mammography had shown abnormal calcium deposits in my left breast.  I had needle biopsies, and then surgery to remove the suspect tissue. I was told that I require diagnostic mammograms every year, but they stopped once police became involved in my medical care.  The last time I insisted on one, when I arrived at the lab on Vxxxxxxx and XXnd, a technician told me that their machine was not working and walked me down the street to the Cancer Society screening mammography office (that was not a diagnostic mammogram and was totally unsuitable).  I guess police are hoping that I develop breast cancer and die.
 
So which course of action will police adopt when I have my eyes examined?  I could be told that my eyes are fine in the hope that I will eventually lose my sight.  Or the optometrist could admit that there is something wrong and refer me to an opthamologist (I hope an intermediate visit to some walk-in medical clinic for a doctor's referral is not necessary).  At that point the police will be in charge of my care because they will interfere with any ordered medical tests.  The opthamologist would probably send me to a laboratory for a complete workup and blood panel.  What's to prevent the cops from deciding to say that I have diabetes, or had a stroke, or may have a brain tumor?  They could influence matters any way they want and have me diagnosed with multiple problems.  Meanwhile, the opthamologist will be watching me like a hawk for any abnormal behavior which might be used to certify me.  Perhaps I'd be referred to a neurologist who, in order to discredit me, would look for brain damage (and s/he'd find it because I suffered a closed-head injury in that 1991 head-on motor vehicle accident). 
 
All this is why I stay away from doctors and dentists as much as possible.  I really do want to have my eyes examined, but I will be opening up a Pandora's box of troubles for myself.  Since police started abusing and harassing me, I have not found any group of professionals (who supposedly monitor their own conduct and ethics) who would carry out their sworn duties without succumbing to police pressure to treat me unethically.  It's really quite disgusting.
 
The Ohio probate court is also quite disgusting.  A letter dated October 28th is at the end of this email.  In two documents I stated that my brother had been contacted by a U.S. security agency which engaged his help in discrediting me and in alienating me from my family.  The first was my attempt to contest my mother's will which was written on August 23, 2009, and the second was my reply to my brother's letter to the court of July 7, 2009, which I wrote on October 22, 2009.  In response to both those documents, the court declares that they were not in the proper form and therefore "there is nothing for the court to rule on".  Clearly anything which mentions the abuse by police and the U.S. security agency will be declared a nullity.  Is the judge pretending that he never saw my documents?  Will they be placed in the court file or have they already been discarded?
 
Here's a chronology of my major documents sent to the court, with dates mailed: 
June 18, 2009 - Claim against the estate
[August 3, 2009 - Claim rejected by co-executor fiduciaries.]
August 14, 2009 - Request for a ruling by the court on my claim which had been denied
                         by co-executors sent with $10 filing fee
August 23, 2009 - Will contest sent
[Sept.8, 2009 - Will contest dismissed for failure of Plaintiff to comply with the Civil Rules
                                    governing complaints.]
October 22, 2009 - Reply to my brother's July letter about the claim;
                           At the end, I once again request a ruling by the court.
[October 28, 2009 - court declares "nothing to rule on"]
 
In its letter, the Court purposely ignores my request for a ruling written on August 12th, and I sent a $10 filing fee with that.  Why didn't the court notify me in August that my request for a ruling was not proper, and that I had to commence an action?  Obviously because they wanted to insure that I had no chance of being successful.  First the U.S. security agency made certain that no lawyer in that area of Ohio would help me, and then the court rejected anything I tried to do.  The fix was in.
 
By the way, I think that my brother's letter of July 7th was backdated and that it actually was written after he read my will contest document.  Perhaps he was ordered to write it by the U.S. security agency. At the end of the month, I will once again request copies of all the documents in the court file since my last request.
 
Obviously I didn't expect that my claim or my contest would be successful.  But I wanted to leave a written record of what has been done to me.  Now I suspect that the probate court will destroy the two documents in which I described abuse by the U.S. security agency and the RCMP.  At least everything appears in malcanada's LiveJournal.  You'd think I'd be immune by now, but it's always a disappointment when lawyers, physicians, and courts turn out to be sleazy, unethical accomplices of police agencies.
 
We've had sunny weather, but today is showery, very windy, and warm.  I keep sweeping up leaves.  No one bothered me while I was out in the community during the past week.  The amount of noxious inhalant being used in this apartment is shocking.
 
I'll write to you again after my eye examination.
 
Please save my journal.    Wish me luck.
 
 
 
_________________________________________________________________________________
 
                                               IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
                                                            PROBATE DIVISION 
                                                        Xxxxxxxxx COUNTY, OHIO                      FILED
 
IN RE: ESTATE OF Gxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, DECEASED                                           Oct. 28  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        2009
CASE NO. 2009 ES 00xxx
___________________________________________

                            DECISION ON REQUEST TO RULE ON CLAIM

     This matter came on for consideration upon a letter received from the decedent's daughter, Xxxxx Xxxxx, which requests that the Court rule on her claim that she filed on June 26, 2009.

     The claim was rejected by the fiduciary on August 3, 2009.

     Pursuant to R.C. 2117.12 when a claim has been rejected, the claimant must commence an action on the claim within two months after the rejection or be forever barred from maintaining an action.
 
[on August 14, 2009, I sent a request for a ruling along with a $10 filing fee by Xpresspost.  I was not notified that this was not a substitute for an action.]
 
     The claimant, Xxxxx Xxxxx, has not timely filed a proper action on the rejected claim. Accordingly, there is nothing for the Court to rule on. A letter such as the one received in this case asking the Court to rule on her claim is not the proper method for contesting a rejected claim. As such, there is nothing for the Court to rule on since the claim was properly rejected and no action was commenced within the time frame allowed by Ohio Law.

                                                                        ENTER AS TO THE DATE QF FILING:
                                                                        (signed)
                                                                        Txxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, Judge
 
COPY TO:
me
the two co-executors

Link

EmailToEtal: Aunt's house & care; Xxxxx Property Mgmt. [Oct. 31st, 2009|05:11 pm]
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 5:04 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: My aunt's house; Xxxxx Property Mgt.
 
 
 
I am shocked by what the U.S. security agency and the RCMP have done to my poor elderly aunt.  I was convinced that the agency, along with my family, had found some way to remove my name from the NYC house title.  But no, my name is still on the deed.  In order to prevent me from receiving $40,000, they have kept my aunt from selling the house, and from even renting it, and the house has been standing vacant for three years while she is a Medicaid recipient in a substandard nursing home.  What a disgrace.  I can't help my aunt.  I'd be at risk if I even travelled to the U.S., and imagine the entrapment options if I went there and started dealing with her sleazy lawyers.
 
I guess my receiving $40,000 which would allow me to move away from this condominium really might save me from the police.  Otherwise, why would they go to such extreme measures to keep the money from me?  That police agencies would do this to an elderly woman shows how debased they are.
 
What is my brother's excuse?  He has been the U.S. security agency's helper all along.  Has he no influence with them?  Why would he let them do this to our aunt?  When he was a child, before I was born (we're nine and a half years apart) he and my parents and my aunt all lived together.  She always doted on him.  Doesn't he care at all about her?  Why didn't he fly to NYC and at least make arrangements for an agent to rent the house, pay the taxes, keep it in repair, and provide some income to my aunt? 
 
Why didn't my brother simply pay me the $40,000 to save myself in the first place so that I would sign the property transfer back into my aunt's name and the house could have been sold?  (Before my family tried to cheat me with the escrow agreement, I intended to repay them when I sold this apartment.)  Why did my brother allow my aunt to sign an agreement  to pay a lawyer 30% after the house is seized for back taxes?  Why allow the house to be seized for taxes at all when it can be sold or rented?  My brother should get her out of that legal agreement.
 
If they had a buyer for the house, and I know that the man next door wanted to purchase it, why didn't they just ask for a $40,000 downpayment, pay it to me, have the papers signed, and they let the man have the house?  There were a number of ways for me to get the money and remove my name from the deed.  But the U.S. security agency and the RCMP, and my brother, didn't want that to happen.
 
It's obvious that my brother will go to any length, along with police agencies, to prevent me from receiving the money in order to try to save myself.  He'd let the house sit vacant and fall apart rather than sell it (or even rent it) to keep me from escaping this situation or to prevent me from ever realizing any profit from the house.  I never intended to hang onto the house.  How I wish my aunt had agreed to my suggestion of a reverse mortgage before any of this started. 
 
My aunt has pension income and she could afford to support herself and the house, but she had to use her savings to pay for household help.  She suffers from arthritis, and over twenty years, she paid a daily housekeeper a generous salary (with vacation pay), and then for the last six, she hired a daytime health aide at an even more generous salary as well, and all her money was used up on the two helpers (and still she was always alone at night).  The two women even ate meals at my aunt's house.  She wasn't wise to spend so much, and although my brother visited her in NYC, he said nothing about the arrangements.  As for me, neither my mother nor my aunt thought I have any money sense, so they ignored my repeated advice that a live-in helper, who would do both jobs, could be hired for the minimum wage from any number of local employment agencies.  Perhaps my mother really did expect that, when my aunt's money was used up, I would live in the house as an unpaid maid/nurse.
 
Anyway, all of these family members (my brother, three of his children, and my dead brother's daughter in Florida) who are so willing to help the U.S. security agency entrap me and keep me in a horrible situation should assist my aunt.  She needs to either be in her own home with adequate care, or in a comfortable facility she likes.  Given their actions to perpetuate the present situation, they have a moral responsibility to help her.
 
Things are much the same here.  Everything the RCMP and local police do to me makes me more determined to resist them and their efforts.  I guess the noxious inhalant is supposed to wear me down, either physically or emotionally.  It's not doing that, but it is keeping poor Louie-Louie sick.  Today he is hiding.  Siamese Mike stays outside all the time to avoid the inhalant, and cold causes Siamese fur to darken, so he is getting dark all over, even on his abdomen.  I went out to different stores this week and there were no entrapment attempts  that I noticed.  Someone has made the dent in the roof of my car much larger - it's awful.  I never received my bank checking statement, but the one for the following month arrived.  I use my debit card for everything, and I still can't balance my checkbook, but I am reluctant to go to that bank branch where something bad always happens to me.  Will bad things also happen to me when I go out shopping in the coming week?
 
Xxxxx Property Management has never sent me the financial information I requested so many times.  Now I notice that the council minutes no longer contain a financial report, although one is presented at each meeting.  Here's a quote from the [local newspaper]: "Xxxxx manages many of the single-room-occupancy hotels -- or SROs -- purchased last year by the provincial government."  Both the city and the province use Xxxxx's services in a major way.  For Xxxxx to take on managing this private condominium was an anomaly and a favor for police and the city.  Why would that organization lend itself to something so demeaning as defrauding me?
 
It's been raining lately, but contrary to the forecast, today is sunny, warm, and breezy.  My horse chestnut tree has lost all its leaves, and those on the magnolia are starting to fall.  Heavy rain removed the last roses, but there are still large buds on the bush.  Will they bloom?  The tree at the building's back door, because of the prevailing west wind, drops most of its leaves on my patio, and it is starting now.  My patio needs constant sweeping all through November just to keep the leaves in check.  If it's sunny again tomorrow, I'll clean out there.  The raccoons and the skunk still show up some nights.  I planted wild bird seed in a long planter (the original plant was one of those killed by my neighbors), and I think I told you that the skunk dug up all the pretty little blue and yellow flowers and other small plants.  However, he left the tough corn plants growing (the planted kernels were all in little pieces and I was surprized that they germinated) and there's an attractive shock of corn growing against the patio fence.  Now I notice that there are three baby ears of corn developing, but the cold will get them soon.
 
Halloween fireworks are sold here which upsets the cats.  However, this condominium is locked so I don't see any trick or treaters.  Happy Halloween.
 
Please save this journal.    Wish me luck.
 
 
 
Link

Reply to my brother's letter to probate court [Oct. 22nd, 2009|06:11 pm]

My brother's info about my aunt's care, her lawyer, and her house is shocking.

*** Look what the U.S. security agency and the RCMP have done to my poor aged aunt just to keep me from collecting $40,000.***  (nine paragraphs at end of letter)

 

October 22, 2009

Xxxxxxx County Probate Court                        By facsimile

xxx Xxxxxx Street                               [I will send a copy by Xpresspost on Monday]

Xxxxxxx, Ohio xxxxx

 

Re: Case number 2009 ES 00xxx - The Estate of Gxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx

 

To The Court:

Because my claim against the estate of my mother, Gxxxxx Xxxxxxx, for four items of my personal property which were at her home is still outstanding, I feel that it is necessary to respond to the letter of July 7, 2009 written to the court by co-executors, Axxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Jr., and Rxxx X. Xxxxxxx, and to its lengthy attachment authored by Axxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Jr.

The co-executors’ long explanations about whether my mother died in hospital, at home, or in a nursing home, or how my personal property was given away or sold simply do not matter. The four items belong to me and neither my mother nor the co-executors had the right to dispose of my property.

The suggestion that I be paid $100 for the small antique trunk which is similar to those for sale at antique stores for more than $500 is ludicrous. These articles of personal property have great emotional value for me and my claim is not about money. I want the four items which belong to me to be returned to me.

I respond below to the false statements in the attachment to the July 7th letter by my brother, Axxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Jr., in the order in which they appear. Much of what he is written is so outrageous that I suspect he thought I would never read his document.


In the first section entitled “The Invalidity of Xxxxx Xxxxx’s Claims”

In the first paragraph my brother states that: “The sapphire ring was not given to Xxxxx When she was a baby by her paternal grandmother as she states.” I never heard the engagement ring story before. I can only inform you that my father told me several times that my paternal grandmother gave me her aunt’s ring because it was my birthstone. On my visits, my mother and I usually looked at the jewellery she had at home and in the contents of her bank safety deposit box, and I would try on the ring. She too told me every time that the ring was mine and I would have it when she died.

In the second paragraph, in his discussion about the pearls, my brother states: “Xxxxx took some of my mother’s jewellery away with her when she went to college” as though I were wearing and keeping the pearls without permission. That is not true. My parents presented the pearls to me as a gift for high school graduation and I wore them frequently at home and away at university. On a visit to my dormitory more than two years later, my mother opened my jewel box and took the pearls because she thought they would not be safe at school. I wore the pearls for my wedding, and then left them in my mother’s keeping while my husband and I went to Europe for a six month honeymoon. When I returned, my mother continued to say that she would take care of the pearls for me and would not let me take them home. She always referred to them as “your pearls” or “Xxxxx’s pearls”.

In the third paragraph, my brother discusses the diamond ring. Clearly he wants to keep it. Every statement he makes is untrue, and I do not believe that he is quoting my aunt correctly. My mother did not “take the ring” from me at “the same time she took the pearls”. The night before my wedding I took the ring off my finger and asked my mother to take care of it while I was in Europe. I had been wearing the ring every day for more than five years. My uncle, Pxxxx Xxxxxx, did not give me the ring “on a whim”, and it had not previously been my aunt’s. He said he bought it for me because he had recently given both my aunt and my mother rings and he wanted to give one to me, too. When I returned from Europe, my mother would not give me my ring. Eventually she began to say that I could have it back when she died. Through the years, whenever my mother wore the ring while my aunt and I were with her, my aunt would make a joking remark about my mother having stolen my ring from me.

In the fourth paragraph my brother states that he didn’t remember ever seeing the antique trunk which my uncle also gave me. He goes on to say “ . . . that Xxxxx Xxxxx had abandoned all of the belongings she left there many years previously gives ownership of the trunk to Gxxxxx Xxxxxxx.” Those statements are false. He was aware of the trunk, and the letters in it were priceless to me and irreplaceable. Further, I never abandoned my belongings. My mother was so adamant that I could not remove to my home any of the items which she thought were valuable that I feared that I would rupture my relationship with her if I insisted on taking away my personal property. She often told me that I would get my belongings back when she died.

The exceptions were two cartons of my psychology experiments, term papers, exams, and other university material which my deceased father had saved for me. These items held no value for my mother and she threatened to throw away the two boxes on several occasions. About six years ago there was a flood in her storage room, and the two cartons, which were on the lowest shelf, became wet and she discarded them.

As an aside, my uncle also gave me a small eighteenth century engraved silver snuff box. I still have that gift because I carried it in my purse while my husband I were in Europe and I never let it fall into my mother‘s hands.

In the second section entitled “Xxxxx Xxxxx’s lack of credibility”

The first paragraph asserts that there is no family feud, but to any reader it would be evident from my brother’s vitriol and vindictiveness toward me in this document that there certainly is a feud against me by other family members. It never even occurred to me that I would some day be expected to become either my mother’s or my aunt’s live-in unpaid housekeeper/caregiver. If my mother put bank accounts and certificates of deposit in my name, and my aunt added my name to her house deed because they expected that of me, I never realized it. I thought they took those actions to make inheritance easier and to lessen taxes. Why would my brother write, “This despite Xxxxx Xxxxx never contributing a penny to the bank accounts or to the upkeep of Aunt Exxxxxx’s home.”? He didn’t contribute to their bank accounts or to their homes. And why is my brother preoccupied with my pseudonymous internet journal in which all the names and places are xxxx’ed out?

The second paragraph continues, “The statements Xxxxx Xxxxx makes about our mother making derogatory remarks about her and being stridently estranged from her are untrue.” How does he know what our mother said to me on the phone?  Everything in my submissions to the court is true. Certainly my brother knows that my mother became estranged from me because of slander and gossip about me which he repeated to her over a number of years.

I was illegally placed under surveillance by my last employer, the City of Xxxxxxxx. When I found out about the illegal snooping, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police attempted to destroy my credibility and involved a U.S. security agency to assist them. The U.S. agency approached my brother who seized the opportunity to work against me. For years my brother repeated, in frequent phone conversations with my mother, every lie and every slur uttered against me, although he knew they were untrue. My mother was convinced by my brother that the nastiness about me was factual, and she regularly passed all this hateful gossip on to my aunt. The fact that my brother was willing to upset these two elderly women so profoundly in order to hurt me shows his basic character. Eventually the family atmosphere became so poisonous that for self-preservation I withdrew from contact.

My mother did not pay for my airline tickets when I visited her annually or more often. I paid my own fare, and once when my now deceased younger brother called me at night to tell me that our father had been hospitalized, I paid $1200 for a one-way ticket in order to leave on the earliest morning flight. My brother, Axxxxx Xxxxxxx, did not bother to go to Ohio during that illness of my father. My mother did pay for a rental car on my visits, during which I drove her on an outing every day, and we took turns paying restaurant bills. On my last two visits I paid to rent a collapsible wheel chair so that we could stay out all day without my mother becoming unnecessarily fatigued.

My brother went on to write, “When Xxxxx’s car failed up there where she lived, my mother and Aunt Exxxxxx sent her money to buy a brand new automobile.” How annoyed he must have been, and what a distortion of the facts. That he reports this incorrectly throws everything he ever writes into question. My car didn’t fail. A teenager in a pick-up truck hit me head on, my car was demolished, and I was seriously injured. My mother and I had a number of phone conversations, and when I started to recover, I told her that I was going to buy a used car (I am ever frugal). My car was insured, I had savings, and there was a personal injury settlement on the way. My mother was annoyed that I would buy a used car, and she and my aunt each sent me $5,000 so that I would buy a brand new one. I did buy a new Toyota and I was very happy that they had sent me such a wonderful get well gift.

I never said that my mother and my aunt did not care for me and did not love me. Certainly I cared for them and loved them. My brother is insensitive to the dynamics of interpersonal relations and it is possible that he did not understand the nature of my relationship with my mother or my aunt and/or what I have written about it. Because my family did not approve of my life choices, coupled with their tendency to be controlling, both my aunt and my mother presented control issues which made it wise for me to live far away from them. It did not mean that I did not care about them. They both knew that I loved them - that’s why they would put a house, a certificate of deposit, and two bank accounts in my name. My long phone conversations with both my mother and my aunt were often the highlight of my week, and it was a great sadness to me that I could no longer speak to them because my brother continually repeated slander about me and had poisoned their minds against me.

The third paragraph presumes to describe how my son and I became estranged, but once more my brother has misstated the events and trivialized them to an astounding degree. My estrangement from my son was a three year cumulative process, and our last meeting was not as he describes. (It’s actually none of his business so I won‘t tell the story here.) Then my brother states, “Later, she [our mother] had wills drawn up and gave me power-of-attorney, so that I could do the job that she had hoped that xxxxx xxxxx could do for her.” Why does he assume that it was my job? How resentful he is that he had to put out effort for her. It was the same when my father was sick. My brother just keep yelling that he had to be at his own home and that he had his own life and family to manage.

In the fourth paragraph, my brother states that I complained that both my son and I have been disinherited. I did not complain on my own behalf since I expected to be disinherited when I stopped speaking to my mother and my aunt. I simply want the four items which belong to me. And as for my son, although my current will does not bequeath him my Canadian apartment or any cash, I did provide for him to inherit my interest in my aunt’s N.Y.C. house along with my jewellery and other personal possessions.

This section of my brother’s submission is badly structured and lacks continuity. I will deal with part of paragraph six here. My brother makes much of an a parenthesized aside in my internet journal that my widowed sister-in-law never liked my mother. He seems to be fixated on my blog. As I stated above, he is oblivious to interpersonal dynamics, while I am a retired Registered Clinical Counsellor. My sister-in-law doesn’t like me either, but nothing hinges on her likes or dislikes. It was merely a statement of an observation I have made through the years. I do not begrudge my younger brother’s widow her inheritance and she has been a dutiful daughter-in-law for many years. As well, she promised her husband near the end of his life that she would always be kind to my mother.

The fifth paragraph is so egregiously false and nasty that I don’t know where to begin. I never “told my mother that Exxxxxx was always the rich one, now she can she what it is like to be poor”. What a shocking allegation. All through my childhood, teen years, and up through my living in N.Y.C. as a young married woman, my aunt was incredibly good to me. In fact, she was always nicer to me than my mother was. I have never said anything unkind about my aunt and I would never do so. All of my brother’s statements in this paragraph are misleading or untrue, and his jealousy and spite toward me show clearly.

***Let me repeat part of the paragraph here: “Xxxxxx would not sign any papers pertaining to selling or refinancing the house. As a result, my aunt’s money ran out and she had to enter a nursing home as a Medicaid recipient. She had a very poor choice of nursing homes, and also she was unable to pay real estate taxes on the house. The house is sitting vacant for three years with no taxes being paid on it. So Xxxxx has the satisfaction of seeing her aunt poor, but at the same time it is also her property that is being run down. Eventually the City of New York will take it over. Futhermore my aunt will have to pay a lawyer she has contracted with to recover her interest in the house a thirty percent recovery fee. Xxxxx will not even speak to the lawyer but she will ride free on the sale without any legal fees when the city finally seized the house and puts it up for sale.”

***If any of the above about my aunt’s situation is true, my brother should hang his head in shame. How could a woman who owns a $750,000 house become a Medicaid recipient? If my brother knew that my aunt was receiving substandard care and did nothing about it, he is disgusting.

***First of all, I was the only one in the family who tried to convince my aunt to take a reverse mortgage on the house so that she could live there with income until she died. My mother, after consulting with my brother, told my aunt that she would lose the house and “be out on the street” if she listened to me about a reverse mortgage. Thereafter my aunt would not consider it. Why has the house sat vacant for three years? My aunt’s lawyer of many years is also a realtor. Why hasn’t the house been rented, and the income used for it’s upkeep, taxes, and for my aunt’s care? New Yorkers go away for years and leave their homes in the hand of an agent who takes care of everything. What is the lawyer doing for his 30%? I sent the N.Y. property registry my change of address when I moved to this apartment and I have received no tax bills from the City of New York, nor any other governmental correspondence pertaining to the house. In fact, I have been convinced that my family had found some legal means to remove my name from the house deed and that my aunt had sold it, so this information from my brother is a revelation.

***I have never refused to sign papers pertaining to the house, and I have had contact with two different lawyers who told me they represented my aunt. I simply want to be paid the $40,000 to which I believe that I am entitled at the same time that I sign the papers relinquishing my interest, and neither lawyer was willing to do that.

***As well as dealing with my aside about my sister-in-law, paragraph six contains more crazed and amazing allegations about my aunt’s house. I quote my brother here: “Also, Xxxxx Xxxxx accused Mxxxxxxx Nxxxxxx, [my niece], of plotting against her with Xxxxx’s own lawyer. Actually, Mxxxxxxx was attempting to assist Aunt Exxxxxxx Xxxxxx in dealing with her house ownership problem. She was not plotting with anybody. My mother even sent $40,000 to Xxxxx through Aunt Exxxxxxxx’s lawyer to Xxxxx’s lawyer in Canada. But Xxxxx would not even talk to her own lawyer, because Mxxxxxxx Nxxxxx’s name was mentioned in a letter. Mxxxxxxx was merely helping Aunt Exxxxxxx to try to draw financial resources from her house, something Aunt Exxxxxxx had expected that Xxxxx would do for her.”

***Here’s what really happened. My aunt’s lawyer sent me a letter stating that my aunt was willing to pay me $40,000 to sign property transfer papers to remove my name from the deed. I was pleased, and I engaged a lawyer here to handle the matter. I gave my lawyer instructions twice verbally and twice in writing (once in an email) that I would sign the papers only at the time that the certified check for $40,000 was handed to me. He agreed, but then he began to take instructions from my aunt’s lawyer in New York or from someone else. He stalled, wasted time, and told me that he had to write an escrow agreement. I replied that I had not engaged his services to do that that and that I would not pay him for preparing that agreement. Then he - my own lawyer- sent me an email saying that Mrs. Nxxxxxx would pay his bill. At first I did not even know whom he meant because I had no idea that he had been talking to my niece in Florida about my private legal business.

***Once again I told my lawyer that I would sign the papers only at the time that a check was handed to me. He said he could not guarantee that, that my aunt’s lawyer wanted to hold the $40,000 in a U.S. escrow account. I then received an email from my niece, Mxxxxxxx Nxxxxxx, stating that my mother had asked her to liquidate all my aunt’s belongings in the house (she did not mention what that had to do with dealing with my lawyer without my knowledge). I did not reply. Then I told my lawyer that his behavior had been unprofessional and that I had decided not to pursue the matter. I knew that if I signed the property transfer papers that I would never receive the $40,000 from a N.Y. escrow account while I live in a foreign country. No one has contacted me since then about any aspect of business concerning my aunt’s house.

***I have always been willing to transfer the house title back to my aunt or to sell the house. I simply insist that I be paid $40,000 in a certified check at the time I sign any legal papers.

***It never occurred to me that my aunt would be badly treated, and I receive no news about my family. My brother and other family members should be looking out for her best interests. It is an absolutely abhorrent idea that my aunt may be suffering because my brother won’t allow her to rent or to sell the house because he doesn’t want any monetary advantage to accrue to me. If he is doing that to her, he is an evil fool. I would only take the $40,000. All of the unpleasantness which has occurred in our family is due to my brother’s vile efforts.

I am deeply disappointed that my brother has written such a sloppy, dishonest, and hateful submission. I hope my comments have thrown some light on the matter. Please file this letter in the court file.

And once again, I petition the court to issue a ruling in the matter of my claim against the estate of Gxxxxx X. Xxxxxx for the four items of my personal property which were at her home.

Sincerely,

 

xxxxxx

 

 

 

Link

EmailToEtal: False statements by brother in court file; Not all file material there [Oct. 20th, 2009|03:31 pm]
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 3:27 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: False statements by brother in court file; Not all file material was sent

 
 
Thanksgiving dinner was very nice.  Last week was mostly quiet until Thursday when remodeling by Txxxxxx Xxxxxxx and friends began in 30x, with loud swearing over screeching power saws, and continued nonstop until Sunday night.  Oxxx Xxxxxxx's apartment 30x has been sold, and now Jxxx Xxxxxxx has 20x on the market.  Prices have rebounded here, and property is more expensive than ever.
 
I received copies of partial file contents from probate court yesterday.  There is a closely typed four page July 7th statement from from brother in response to my claim for the four items which belong to me.  It's basically just a personal attack on me, but it is rife with lies and distortions.  It requires an answer and I will write one this week and send you a copy and post it in my journal.  He seems a bit crazed, but perhaps it is only vindictiveness.
 
It's intersting that, in his submission to the court, although my brother calls my malcanada journal "disturbed and disturbing" and refers to specific content, he never mentions my charge, nor denies nor confirms it, that he assisted a U.S. security agency to abuse me and pulled my mother and my aunt into the matter.  There is no reference to police agencies at all in his July 7th material.
 
I will soon again request copies of the court file material because there is nothing included in this mailing for my challenge to the inventory, the hearing, or my attempt to contest the will.  July 7th is the latest date in the mailing. There must be a great deal of material which I have not received.  Has my brother written something else which is truly libelous?  I wish he would wind up in some situation wherein he would have to give evidence under oath, but judging by the July 7th document, he would simply perjure himself.
 
On Sunday I decided to do my grocery and drug store shopping rather than writing to you.  XXX was okay, but the small Phxxxxxxxx store was creepy and I was left alone by staff in there for five minutes.  Yesterday I went shopping and bought myself a new bathrobe, but I couldn't find any slacks I liked.
 
When I returned to my car which was parked on busy Fxxxxx Street yesterday, a fit-looking East Indian man was loitering by it with a cell phone to his ear.  Then walking in the street along the line of parked cars, he approached me quickly.  He looked like a cop - was he going to push me into traffic or spray me unconscious?  I moved away, and he went to my front bumper and pointed at the rounded corner and asked me if there was a new dent.  Because I wouldn't go close to him, without even looking, I replied no.  He said the huge SUV parked in front of me had backed into my car.  No, it hadn't.  It was so high, it would have broken my headlights or dented the grill or a fender.  Why would a stranger involve himself about a possible bump to my old battered car?  It was all silly and there was a driver sitting in the SUV.  Was I supposed to become imbroiled in a public argument?  If I'm ever in any kind of loud scene, the police will magically appear and declare that I was irrational and remove me.  I called thanks to the man and quickly drove away.
 
 
We've had some rain, and my wooden patio deck is sodden from the roof drain pipe opening which has been buried next to my fence.  Mushrooms are growing on the rotting boards constantly, and I go out and scrape them off with a screwdriver only to have them immediately reappear.  One variety looks like little human brains.

I still have not received the bank statement which should have arrived in September.  Two days from now it is time for a new statement to arrive.  Will I get it? 
 
The leaves are falling in earnest now, although the streets are still brightly lined with color.  On my patio, the horse chestnut tree is russet and gold.  For the first time ever, my magnolia tree has orange berries on it.  The rose bush is still blooming.  My squirrel friend, who wasn't around all summer, is here asking for raw shell-less peanuts all the time.  The noxious inhalant in the apartment is staggering, worse than ever if that's possible (more than a half hour at my computer and I develop a violent headache and sleeping in it is hell), and Louie-Louie does not feel well.  Siamese Mike is mostly staying outside with Trixie.
 
I will send you my submission to the probate court as soon as it is written.
 
Please save my journal.   Wish me luck.
 
 
 
Link

Email to Etal: Probate Ct denied exception; Another voice from the past; More to bank [Oct. 11th, 2009|05:08 pm]

 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 5:01 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Probate Ct denied exception; Another voice from the past; More to bank
 
 
So the Nobel committee gave the peace prize to a president who is engaged in two major foreign wars and has escalated one of them.  Bill Clinton must be furious.  I think it was a political move designed to encourage Obama to oppose the Bush philosophy.  Will he now be able to increase the war effort in Afghanistan?
 
It's another beautiful weekend, but the weather, although continuing sunny, is chillier.  The nighttime temperature is in the 30's (below 5 Celsius) which is unseasonably cold.  The days are in the 50's (above 10 C.).  Everything is clear and bright, the trees are colorful, and it really feels like Thanksgiving.
 
I received a copy of a probate court order which was filed on September 28th about my application for an exception to the inventory of my mother's estate.  This was the matter of the savings bank account with my name on the statement as the secondary owner.  Rxxx Xxxxxxx, my brother's co-executor, testified at the hearing. The one page order states: "Based on the testimony and evidence presented, the court finds by clear and consistent evidence that the Peoples Bank Savings Acoount No. xxxxxx0820 was established as an individual account . . . by the decedent and continued to be held solely in the name of the decedent . . .  until the time of her death. . . . Accordingly the Court finds no merit in the exception to the inventory and hereby ORDERS the exception denied . . ."   
 
No one, though, seems to dispute the fact that I am the secondary owner of my mother's checking account, but that was emptied before I even knew that my mother had died.  Then when I inquired about it, the Ohio bank told me that the account was overdrawn.  I'm still waiting for the rest of the court file contents to arrive.  There might be something hateful in there which would require more effort.  Otherwise, I'll wait a while and then once again apply for a ruling from the judge on my claim for the four items which belong to me but were at my mother's home when she died.  I think that he will decline to issue a ruling in the matter.
 
On October 7th, I received a long telephone message from a woman I haven't seen in at least fifteen years, and perhaps it's longer than that.  She used to be a residence coordinator in one of the half-way houses run by the mental health nonprofit where I worked for almost twenty years (it was my employer while I worked at court, and before I created the court project, I was the director of that nonprofit).  She had a healthy employment history and a good work ethic, and she was efficient at her job and genuinely concerned about the residents.  However, the curse of the counsellor is never to be able to  take anyone at face value, and I suspected that she was a secret drinker, had been an abused child, and that she might even be mildly bi-polar.  For a while she tried to attach herself to me, and I did a few things with her, but I wasn't looking for a friend.  She dropped into court to visit several times - when you work in a public building people feel free to visit at will.
 
Before she came to work in mental health, she lived in an apartment building owned by a professional man who had shady connections.  She attached herself to him and his wife, and they were nice to her - took her to an island, let her stay at their house there, took her on their boat.  She made friends among that couple's friends, and she even acquired a boyfriend through them.  Then, I think it was about fifteen years ago after she had already  quit the mental health agency, she called me to say that she was in trouble.  I forget the details.  It was some uproar about a man, I think an argument, she was drinking, and for some reason she threw the man's guns in her car, and drove off furiously.  Of course, she was stopped by the police and charged. 
 
She had been released on bail and I offered to introduce her to a defense lawyer.  She demurred.  She said she had been talking to the prosecutor (which shouldn't have been the case) and she'd be all right.  Then in a subsequent call, she told me she had several meetings with a prosecutor who, I thought, was too high in the hierarchy to be dealing with this matter, and that she would plead guilty.  In the end nothing happened.  In our last conversation, I couldn't get her to tell me whether the charge was stayed, or whether she had received a discharge or a suspended sentence.  I never had contact with her again.
 
At that point I suspected that she had sold out her shady former-landlord who had been so kind to her, but who knows?  If so, whatever information she might have given the Crown and the RCMP had, to my knowledge, no immediate effect.  Many years later he was arrested, though, in a financial sting operation.
 
On Wednesday she left me a long message that she is being harassed by the RCMP in the city where she now lives because of this old charge.  She said she wants to take the matter to the Human Rights Commission and she wants my help.  Right.  The RCMP must think I'm really stupid.  How do the police dig up these people from the distant past?  Why do they think that I would respond to any of them?
 
I avoided the bank this past week.  Below is my final (#5) email to TD requesting a monthly statement.  There are several thousand accumulated extra dollars in my checking account so it will never be overdrawn, but I like to know exactly how much is in there.  My electricity bill and my U.S. Social Security deposit (because of the ever fluctuating exchange rate) are always different amounts.  And I really did want to move the surplus money to my savings account.  But that can wait.  It's also wise to check my savings account every once in while to be sure that the RCMP hasn't found a way to drain money out of it.
 
I shopped at Safeway, without incident, for my Thanksgiving dinner and other groceries.  I'm going to  roast half a turkey breast tomorrow with stuffing, gravy, cranberries, and pumpkin pie.  I have other delicacies and goodies, too.  I feel very sorry for farmed turkeys, but I just have to make turkey on Thanksgiving.  I'm going to try Tofurkey (it's not available at Safeway, only at Xxxxxx Foods) soon though, and if it's an acceptable alternative, I'll cook that for Christmas.  I actually eat very little meat, but I don't seem to be able to eliminate it from my diet all together, and especially not on holidays.
 
Everything else is much the same here.  I won't run through it all again today.  I hadn't seen Jinx for a week, but he showed up this morning to search the apartment.  I washed the windows yesterday, so the juvenile raccoons will probably arrive soon with their sticky little hands.  My Grootendorst rose bush still has a number of blooms - last year I picked the final rose on November 4th.
 
Happy Thanksgiving to you Canadians.
 
Please save my journal.    Wish me luck.
 
 
_______________________________________
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: [TD bank]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: U-158221/FAF59132 Self-Service Accts

 
 
Hello Exxxx,
 
Once more you have emailed me useless information.
 
As I've written several times, I don't wish to again use EasyLine phone service.
 
In your last message you also suggested EasyWeb.  I am not registered with EasyWeb, and it would require a visit to a TD branch in order for me to become registered.
 
If it were convenient for me to go to a bank, I could simply ask for a print out of my account activity.
 
You have my branch number, my access card number, and the last three numbers of my chequing account.  There is no reason why you can't have an account statement sent to me.
 
I have been a customer of TD for decades.  It's disgraceful that TD Canada Trust won't simply mail me a bank statement to replace the one that never arrived.
 
Sincerely,
 
xxxxx
 
 
Link

Email to Etal: Probate Ct. replies; TD Bank- tool of police; Supermarket pick-up; Laundry mystery; I [Oct. 4th, 2009|03:08 pm]

----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 3:05 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Probate Court replies; TD Bank- tool of police; Supermarket pick-up; Laundry mystery; Inhalant; Media attack on judges
 
 
 
It's another beautiful weekend.  September was a lovely month.  I hope the weather stays good through October, although I enjoy rainy days too.  Today is the Chinese harvest moon festival (first full moon after the autumn equinox).  They celebrate with the most wonderful little moon cakes, but I didn't get any this year.
 
The probate court replied in two separate emails to my one message asking for copies of the court file and requesting that the court rule on my claim against the estate.  They are both below.  The second email, dealing with my claim is very carefully worded.  I think the judge will decline to rule on the matter.
 
I haven't yet received a letter from probate court informing me what happened at the hearing for exceptions to the inventory.  Of course my ownership of the bank account would have been denied.  I wonder if they will charge me court costs for the hearing.
 
I did receive a bill from the court for costs for my attempt to contest the will.  My  submission wasn't in the correct form therefore it was dismissed without process.  The bill is for $110.15, but they have deducted the ten dollar filing fee so I owe $100.15.  If my submission was in an incorrect form, why did the clerk file it?  Why didn't she send it back to me with a note that it was unacceptable so that I could amend it?  Probably it was handled this way because the court doesn't want any process around my claim that my brother, at the behest of a U.S. security agency, used the slander against me by that U.S. security agency in order to estrange my mother from me and to disinherit me.
 
When I grocery shopped this week at the XXX store on Xxxx Street, two men tried to pick me up.  This is getting ridiculous.  Why do police think I'm looking for a boyfriend?  Or even a female friend for that matter?  I've basically been a loner all my life, and I like being alone.  I mostly enjoyed the people around me, but I don't miss them.  And now after all the betrayal and abuse that has been heaped upon me, I wouldn't trust anyone no matter what. 
 
Perhaps police think I'm looking for someone to do repairs to the apartment, but I would rather pay a handyperson if it is ever safe to call one.  The first man was an ordinary middle-aged guy and didn't particularly look coplike.  When he failed, police sent a fat man with a lot of good food in his cart after me.  That was a more interesting choice on their part, and he was more aggressive than the first man, but I ignored him and never looked at his face.  I used to habitually speak to strangers and exchange pleasantries, but now I no longer do that because it probably isn't safe to do so.
 
Once more the RCMP are wreaking havoc on my banking.  I stopped using telephone banking because of their interference.  And then there was that strange occurrence around a bogus debit card withdrawal from my savings account.  Do I have to once more worry that police are looting my savings account? 
 
I simply am not receiving my bank statements, and I can't balance my check book.  My tax-free account statement for June/July arrived at the end of September (my other large savings account has a bank book instead of a statement).  I had intended to go to the bank this past week, but since my old branch was closed, I do not feel safe at the new far-away branch I must attend  - remember the incident last time?  When I considered that my statements are not arriving, I decided to email the bank.  What a fiasco.  Of course I think that the RCMP is directing the bank's replies.
 
There are six emails with TD bank at the end of this letter.  I believe that each of the bank's three replies was designed to force me to again deal with EasyLine telephone banking.  I won't do that.  The bank's last reply took longer than the guaranteed 24 hour period, and now it also encourages me to use internet EasyWeb banking.  I have always avoided that because the RCMP could possibly interfere, and certainly police could access any banking information in my computer.  I don't have an EasyWeb profile and I don't want to create one.  When I feel like it, I'll look at the bank's site and figure out if I can use it to send a secure message without entering any of my confidential information.  There is no reason why the bank rep couldn't ask the branch to send me a statement - that would not compromise my confidentiality.  TD Canada Trust proved, with its obstacles around renewing my 5-year mortgage, that it is a tool of police, and this is just more of the same.
 
There's something odd going on in the first floor laundry room which shares a wall with my bathroom.  I first noticed on July 18th that the lights were disconnected.  The lights are still out in there, but the machines are fine.  Even if they were broken, they are leased, and the company repairs them within 24 hours.  I can hear when the machines are in use, and no one has been using them for months.  I took my laundry upstairs this week, although I previously have done it in the dark.  What's going on? 
 
The noxious inhalant in my bathroom and my kitchen never stops - it is absolutely terrible and literally sickening.  Is the first floor laundry room unsafe for my neighbors because it shares a wall, pipe openings, and an exhaust shaft with my bathroom?  Is it the noxious inhalant or could something be added to the water in that wall?  (Xxxxx-Next-Door's kitchen shares a wall, etc., with my kitchen, and he is simply never home - it almost seems that he no longer lives here.)  Why are my neighbors avoiding the first floor laundry room for months and months?  What do they know that I don't?  RCMP and local police are capable of doing absolutely anything to me.
 
During every night, starting about 10pm, police also use the inhalant which elevates my pulse and blood pressure and makes my skin bright red and my face feel on fire.  I have to sleep in that stuff, and I  suspect that the police are trying to cause a stroke or heart attack.  It's so heavy lately that my hair is falling out by the handful again.  The elephant tap dance in the apartment above me continues.  Louie-Louie won't sleep out on the patio with Mike and Trixie, and his health is deteriorating because of the inhalant (as happened to poor dead Millie and Chuck).  
 
For some time now there has been an attack on local judges and courts by the media and by police.  My own 17 years at court convinced me that judges are mostly conservative and careful.  The Criminal Code of Canada prescribes the range of jail years for offenses and precedents do the rest.  But there are continual columns in the papers citing specific cases and criticizing judges for not giving more jail time.  And TV news runs stories everyday about victims and the families of victims of crime.  They agitate to prevent to accused persons from receiving bail, and to keep prisoners from having parole hearings (most hearings deny parole and really dangerous offenders never receive parole).  Recently TV media showed family members, an aunt and uncle, crying on the tenth anniversary of some murder. 
 
The Canadian crime rate is low and dropping (only gang crime remains steady).  Yet the media and police have the entire population fixated on crime.  Do we really want a huge percentage of our population in jail as in the U.S.?  We already dedicate a large portion of our resources to police agencies.  An ordinary police officer in this city, after three years, earns $100,000 a year.  Besides, both the media and police know that they are misleading the public - that the only way to make jail sentences longer, to deny bail more often, and to prevent parole hearings is for Parliament to change the provisions of the Criminal Code.  Yet the media continues to feed the frenzy of faultfinding against the judges and the courts.  Perhaps the intent is simply to distract the populace from dealing with social, economic, and environmental problems which should take precedence.  That certainly is the effect of this media and police agitation.
 
Our Thanksgiving is October 12th.  During the coming week I will have to shop for food for the holiday.  There is no supermarket where I feel safe because there have been entrapment attempts at three Safeways, two Bxx-Xxx Foods, two XXX's, SuperStore, Nxxxxxs, and Fxxxxx Foods.  I'm out of new grocery stores to try, so I keep shopping at the old ones - I need food, and I am careful, but I always expect the worst.  I must decide whether to buy Tofurkey this Thanksgiving, but perhaps I should sample that on some non-holiday.
 
The raccoons were here again and put their little hands on the patio sliding door.  I will wait until next week and wash the windows for Thanksgiving. 
 
Trixie's grown-up baby, Jinx, is often on the patio in the morning before I get up.  I suspect that he was just separated from his siblings when he suddenly appeared here.  He remembers me and this apartment from when he was a tiny baby and I used to bring the kittens indoors when it became too cold or too stormy.  Now he shows up, comes inside, and searches all the rooms and looks under the furniture.  He thinks he can find his siblings here, poor guy - that I had them locked in the apartment ovenight.  When he doesn't find them, he leaves without even eating any cat food.  Do you know that two neutered male cats from the same litter who grow up together become inseparable and won't even be bothered with the human owner who provides their food?
 
I'm going to sweep the patio now.
 
Please save my journal.    Wish me luck.
 
 
_________________________________________________
 
----- Original Message -----
From: [probate court]
To: xxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:17 AM
Subject: Gxxxxx Xxxxxxx Estate - copies

 

Dear Ms. Xxxxx:

The copies of papers filed in the Xxxxxxx estate after June 19, 2009, have been mailed to you. You should receive them soon.

Sincerely,

Xxx Xxxxxxx                                                                                                                                                        Deputy Clerk

________________________________

 

[Note that this doesn't say that he will rule on my claim against the estate.]

----- Original Message -----
From: [probate court] 
To: xxxxx
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:54 AM
Subject: RE: Application for ruling by court; copies of documents in file ES 00xxxx

 

Dear Ms. Xxxxx,

When Judge Xxxxxxxx rules on a matter in this case, you will be notified by mail.

Sincerely,

Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx                                                                                                                                                   Deputy Clerk                                                                                                                              

______________________________________

[Email to and from TD Canada Trust, formerly The Toronto Dominion Bank]

From:      xxxxx   

To:          Customer Service
Sent:       09/29/09 05:31 PM
Topic:     EXT FORM - SELF SERVICE
Subject:  Self Service Accounts

My chequing & savings accts. are at branch # XX64.            [I provided the full number for both branches]
My $5,000 tax free acct is at branch # XX66.

I am not receiving my monthly statements in a timely manner. In Sept. I received the July 31 statement for the tax free acct.

I am concerned about my chequing acct. statement which I have not received for Sept. A U.S. cheque is directly deposited in my acct each month, and I can not balance my cheque book without the statement showing me how much was deposited in Canadian money.

I stopped banking by phone because service was not satisfactory. However, I am a retired woman and I can not get to the bank very often to check balances and to have my savings pass book updated.

Will you send the September statement ?
Can you improve service to me?
_______________________________________________


Hello Xxxxx,         [I don't like these people using my first name}

We appreciate your concern regarding the status of your monthly statement. Thank you for taking the time to contact us.

We are able to confirm that a September statement has not yet been generated for your account as today is September 30th. Typically statements are generated and mailed out during the second week of the following month. As such, you should receive your September statement in the mail around October 12th - 15th.

If you wish to discuss your accounts in detail, we encourage you to contact EasyLine telephone banking at 1-866-222-3456 (collect from overseas at 416-983-5393). Representatives are available 24 hours a day and will be pleased to assist you. If you are not registered for EasyLine, kindly press 2.

Alternatively, please feel free to visit or contact the branch nearest you for assistance. For your convenience, branch contact information can be located on our website
here.

Safeguarding our customers' information is a fundamental principle of TD Bank Financial Group. Email is not considered a secure form of communication as the information sent via email is generally unencrypted. For security reasons, personal data and account numbers have been masked in this email. We recommend that you use caution when forwarding email messages to us and that you do not include confidential information, such as account numbers or other personal data, in those messages.

As email is not a secure channel for transmitting information, we regret that we are unable to access your portfolio and assist you via this medium. We apologize for any inconvenience this situation may present.

We hope that this information has been helpful and encourage you to reply to this email if you have any further questions.

Regards,

Exxxx

Internet Correspondence Representative
_____________________________________________________

From:      xxxxx

To:          Customer Service
Sent:       09/30/09 06:41 PM
Topic:     
Subject:  Re: U-158221/FAF59132 Self-Service Accts.


Dear Exxxx,

Sorry, I didn't make my concern clear.

I have not received the chequing account statement which should have arrived during September.
I guess you would refer to it as the August statement. The last statement I received was dated
July 15th to August 17th.

Where is the chequing statement for August 18th to mid-September ?

I need that statement. I do not know how much was deducted from my account for my electricity bill and I do not know how much the U.S. Social Security payment was in Canadian funds.

My bank statements often arrive very late. As I previously emailed you, I received the statement for my $5,000 tax-free account for June/July during the month of September.

May I please have my August chequing account statement?

Thanks,

xxxxx
_________________________________________



Hello Xxxxx,

Thank you for taking the time to reply with further information.

In order to discuss the status of your account and request a duplicate statement if needed, we encourage you to contact EasyLine telephone banking at 1-866-222-3456 (collect from overseas at 416-983-5393). Representatives are available 24 hours a day and will be pleased to assist you. If you are not registered for EasyLine, kindly press 2.

Protecting our customers' privacy and confidentiality is fundamental to the way we do business. As email is not a secure channel for transmitting information, we regret that we are unable to access your portfolio and assist you via this medium. We apologize for any inconvenience this situation may present.

We hope that this information has been helpful and encourage you to reply to this email if you have any further questions.

Regards,

Exxxx
Internet Correspondence Representative
____________________________________


Dear Exxxx,
 
I think it is not unreasonable to ask you to contact branch XX64 and to request that they send me a statement for the period starting August 18, 2009 for my chequing account number xxxx473.  My access card number is [I included the entire number here].  Please confer with your supervisor if it is necessary for you to do so.
 
I have previously informed you that I do not wish to deal with EasyLine telephone banking.
 
I have three accounts, a line of credit, and a mortgage with you.  As time goes on, I grow more and more dissatisfied with the poor service I receive from TD Canada Trust.  Where is the "comfortable"  banking you advertise continually in newspapers and on television?
 
Please have a statement for the August to September period mailed to me. 
 
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
 
Sincerely,
 
xxxxx
_________________________________


Hello Xxxxx,

Thank you for taking the time to reply with your concerns.

Please accept our sincere apologies for the delay in responding to your letter. We strive to respond to all email received in a timely fashion and we wish to assure you that this delay is not typical of the level of service we aim to provide. We regret any inconvenience or frustration this delay may have caused. 

In order for us to assist you with your request, you will need to contact EasyLine telephone banking, your local branch or send us a secure message.

You may contact EasyLine telephone banking at 1-866-222-3456 (collect from overseas at 416-983-5393). Representatives are available 24 hours a day and will be pleased to assist you. If you are not registered for EasyLine, kindly press 2.

Branch contact information can be located on our website
here.

To send a secure message via the Secured Messaging Service, you simply need to log onto your EasyWeb online banking profile. On your 'View Accounts' page you will see an 'EasyWeb Messages' section. To view messages, click on the 'You have 1 unread Secure Messages.' To send a question, you then click on the 'Send a New Message' orange button, fill in the appropriate message and click 'Send Message.' We will then be able to securely answer questions or concerns related specifically to your account.

Safeguarding our customers' information is a fundamental principle of TD Bank Financial Group. Email is not considered a secure form of communication as the information sent via email is generally unencrypted. For security reasons, personal data and account numbers have been masked in this email. We recommend that you use caution when forwarding email messages to us and that you do not include confidential information, such as account numbers or other personal data, in those messages.

As email is not a secure channel for transmitting information, we regret that we are unable to access your portfolio and assist you via this medium. We apologize for any inconvenience this situation may present.

We hope that this information has been helpful and encourage you to reply to this email if you have any further questions.

Regards,

Exxxx
Internet Correspondence Representative

Link

Email to Etal: Applic.to ct. for ruling; Request file contents [Sep. 27th, 2009|04:52 pm]
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 4:38 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Applic.to probate ct. for ruling; Request for file contents
 
  
The weather was sunny and warm all week - it's just been lovely.
 
Things were quiet around here.  I wonder if my neighbours have become reluctant to stage entrapment attempts in the building.  The last few were in the lane and involved people from other nearby buildings.
 
I must to be out and around this week doing errands and shopping.  I have to go to the bank, too, to transfer accumulated money from my checking account into savings.  I stopped banking by phone quite a while ago because there were so many errors and so much rudeness, but after that debacle during my last bank visit I may not be better off doing business in person.  Well, we'll see what happens this time.  I am always on guard out in the community, no matter where I go.  Obviously the XXX supermarket on Xxxx Street  isn't safe for me.  If there are no entrapment attempts in this building, then they will occur in the stores and on the streets.
 
The heavy noxious inhalant continues.  Louie-Louie is still not feeling well and is not himself.  Today a usually wimpy neighborhood cat showed up wearing an Elizabethan collar (the poor guy must have had surgery) and usually tough Louie was so terrified by it that he didn't know which way to run and then had to hide on top of the kitchen cabinets.
 
Here's my latest email to the Xxxx probate court.  My request for a ruling by the court regarding my claim against the estate was ignored, and recently the staff isn't answering my email.  And I need to see what is in the court file.  The court should have a notice in the mail to me this week that my exception to the inventory was dismissed at the hearing on September 25th.
 
It's only two weeks until Canadian Thanksgiving. 
 
Please save my journal.    Wish me luck.
 
__________________________________
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxx
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 4:25 PM
Subject: Application for ruling by court; copies of documents in file ES 00xxx
 
Re:  Estate of Gxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx; case number 2009 ES 00xxx
 
 
 
Dear Ms. Rxxxxxx or Ms. Wxxxxxxx,
 
On August 14, 2009, I mailed you, by XpressPost, an application for a ruling from the court. I enclosed a ten dollar filing fee.  In that application, I requested a court ruling in the matter of the return of four items of my personal property which were at my mother's home at the time of her death.  The fiduciaries of the estate have denied my claim against the estate for these four items. 
 
Once again I request that the court issue a ruling in the matter.
 
Also, on September 19, 2009, I emailed you about the contents of court file ES 00xxx, but you have not replied.  I am representing myself and understand that I am entitled to copies of the contents of the file.  Ms. Xxxx did send me copies of the file contents on June 19, 2009.  However, I need copies of all documents and papers which have been added to court file ES 00xxx since June 19, 2009.
 
In her June 19th letter, Ms. Xxxx billed me $2.21 for copies and postage.  In return, I sent a five dollar payment.  I should have a $2.79 credit with the court for future copies and postage costs.
 
I hope that you will reply soon about these two matters.
 
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
 
Sincerely,
 
xxxxx
 
 
 
 
Link

Email to Etal: Booby-trapped pills; Police entrapment in lane; Prob [Sep. 21st, 2009|05:08 pm]
 

 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
 
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 5:01 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Booby-trapped pills; Police will declare me demented; Police entrapment in lane; Probate Ct;  Rotting deck

 
 
September 25th is the hearing on exceptions to the inventory of my mother's estate.  Please notice in the court email below the implied threat about court costs.  I find it questionable that there was no date set for consideration of my will contest.  There was no  hearing.  And the clerk contends that there is nothing in the file except my submission and the denial sheet.  What could the court costs cover?  - the judge's time for glancing at it and noticing its incorrect form?  - the clerk's time for typing one short form?  They can't intimidate me no matter what they charge me.  And I have a $2.79 credit with them for postage and copies (I previously sent $5 to cover a bill of $2.21).  I do want the rest of the stuff from the probate file.
 
Remember I wrote you that I visited different stores on September 14th, and that I returned home without harm?  Well I was wrong.
 
During this past week, I opened the bottle of Novo Phenarim antihistamine I had bought at the Medicine Xxxxxx #xxx at  xxxx  Kxxxxxx near Vxxxxxxx Drive.  I thought it would be all right because I hadn't been to that drugstore in ages.  Once before I stopped there, the pharmacist received a long phone call, and the clerk delayed me until a policewoman arrived and menaced me.  I wrote you about that incident. 
 
When I took one of the new tablets, I immediately became very sick with a violent headache - I actually thought I might be having a stroke.  Two days later, when I felt well, I experimented swallowing a half tablet and the same thing happened to a lesser degree.  That of course made me think about my visit to the drugstore.  It's on a busy corner and there wasn't a parking space so I drove around the block through the lane twice.  On the second time around I decided that I would park in one of the spaces for the medical clinic which seems to be associated with the drug store.  There were a few spaces at right angles to the lane and I would have to back up to maneuver into the only vacant one. There were no other cars close to me.
 
But when I backed up, I clashed bumpers with a woman driver in a compact car who had appeared out of nowhere.  I signalled that I would finish parking and then talk to her.  People are so mercenary about car insurance that I was sure that she'd have cash registers in her eyes and that I would lose my substantial safe driving discount because she would claim to have a neck injury.  But she was very calm and stood there studying me.  Her front license plate was bent and I asked her if I had done that, but she said it had happened  previously.  Finally she volunteered that there was no damage and we parted.  At the time I thought that she was a unusual person and now I think that she was a policewoman who was delaying me.
 
In the drugstore I poked around a bit, and then I asked the pharmacist (the same one who received the mysterious phone call last time) for the Novo Phenarim.  He and a female clerk pretended not to know where it was at first, and then he picked a lone single bottle which was sitting in open view on his counter.  That should have set off all my alarm bells, but it didn't because I was distracted by the almost accident (I actually wondered if police would convince that driver to later lie and charge me with leaving the scene of an accident).  I even noticed that the pharmacist was smirking, but I let it go.  I'm mad at myself for being stupid.
 
So now I have a second bottle of medication which has been tampered with by police and seems to have a seriously  harmful  element added to it.  It should be analyzed of course, but who would analyze it?  The RCMP lab which does all the work in this province?  Could a private lab be trusted not to fearfully follow police instructions?  I think not.
 
There was another telling element to situation as well.  After the first time I tried the antihistamine, took a whole tablet, and felt horribly sick, I went to sit out on the patio trying to get some fresh air.  Lxxxx on the third floor of the co-op across the lane, and the man who is often there, came out onto her little balcony and stood watching me for the entire time I was on the patio.  It was highly unusual behavior because police have stopped using her as a lulling agent, and she hasn't been on the balcony all summer.  I suspect that they were told to watch me in the hope that I would collapse, and then they could call emergency services and have me collected by an ambulance and police.  (The people who have me under illegal surveillance in my own home couldn't officially call an ambulance.)
 
If the RCMP and local police ever render me unconscious and get me in an ambulance, I will not be able to escape.  I guarantee that I will be declared brain damaged and put in a home for people with dementia.
 
On Thursday, the favored entrapment day of the police, I was taking it easy in the morning and I was still in my nightgown and caftan at 10:30 am.  Suddenly screeching voices erupted in the lane just behind my patio fence.  I was trying to ignore them because I immediately suspected that it was some police ploy.  My best guess is that it supposedly involved a man on a bicycle and a car.  There was a woman's voice that was unbelievable - I have never before heard anyone shriek speech like that.  Hers was a disgusting display no matter what the provocation. 
 
Of course the police arrived, and they began to give the man a hard time.  When he loudly declared, "My mind is whacked out", I was sure it was for me.  Police have always thought that they could entrap me by using my former mentally-disordered clients or by making me feel sorry for unfortunate strangers.  Of course they can't.  The police stayed in the lane for a ridiculously long time - they would never devote an entire hour to such a picayune incident - picking on the man and waiting for me to emerge.  When I ignored them, after an hour and a half or so, all the activity just melted away.
 
The noxious inhalant in my apartment continues at a crippling level.  Police may simply kill me in my sleep.  Louie-Louie is spending more time outside, but he is still sick.  He has stopped grooming himself and his fur is starting to mat.  That's a problem because he won't let me comb him, perhaps simply because he doesn't feel well from the inhalant.  When I insisted on grooming him one day, he ran after me and tried to bite my feet when I finished.
 
The 5:30 to 9am elephant tap dance continues to occur every morning directly over my head in 20x. 
 
I have never received the financial information about the phony $311,500 in repairs which I requested so many times from Axxxx Property Management.   I alone paid that huge assessment, and the only real work done here was replacing the balconies, along with installing a new drain pipe from the roof.
 
My patio deck is deteriorating badly.  I think the other patio floors are okay, and mine was fine until Cxxxxxxx Restorations dug that huge hole next to my western fence.  They put in a new drain pipe down the wall next to my patio fence and then they shallowly buried it in the ground.  I heard the engineer out there telling the workers that it had to be continued out to the retaining wall at the rear property fence.  But they didn't do that.  They buried the mouth of the pipe halfway along my western fence.  All the torrents of water that come off the roof and eavestroughs when it rains are being directed under my patio floor.  The floor boards are five inches wide and eighteen feet long (the width of the patio), and a dozen or so of the long boards are sodden all the time and rotting along their entire length across the patio.  My foot has gone through the floor in two different places, and other breaks are starting to appear.  It could just be due to Cxxxxxxx Restorations' usual incompetence, but I tend to think that it was purposeful.  Police and their tame condo council are determined to deny me the use of my patio.
 
The skunk came in the apartment again.  I'd like to give him a good smack with the broom, but I'm afraid that he'll spray while he's in here.  I wish I could make him go away.
 
I have to wash the windows this week again.  Saturday night the juvenile raccoons were here and they press their little hands on the sliding door.  I actually went outside with my flashlight at 1:30 because I heard something squealing while they were snarling, growling, and jostling as though they were tearing apart some animal and fighting over the pieces.  They were on the patio of Xxxxx-Next-Door and I think they killed a rat because it was very small.  As soon as I put the light on them they became quiet.
 
I had been afraid that the raccoons had captured that pathetic little black cat who walks around the back yard crying.  All the other cats are so mean to it, and it probably doesn't get much food.  I've seen it around a lot lately.
 
Siamese Mike and Trixie and okay.  We've been having lovely sunny warm weather and they are always outside.  Jinx, Trixie's newly appeared grown up baby, still visits briefly once or twice a week, and he doesn't seem to be hungry.  He must get his fair share of whatever food is left for the cats at the vacant lot next door.
 
Lately I've been reading Pauline Kael's movie criticism.  I used to buy the New Yorker primarily to read her reviews.
 
Please save my journal.    Wish me luck.
 
 
_______________________________________
 
From: Txxxx Xxxxxxxx [probate court]   
To: xxxxx
Sent: 17/09/2009 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: Case No. 2009 CV 00375
 

The only documents in Case No. 2009 CV 375 are the initial will contest complaint you filed and the Court’s Entry of Dismissal which was sent to you.  However, if you want another copy of these papers, I will send them to you and add the cost to the bill you will be receiving for court costs as was ordered in the Entry of Dismissal.

Txxxx Xxxxxxx

Deputy Clerk

______________________________________________
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: probate court
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:56 PM
Subject: Case No. 2009 CV 00375 & ES 00174
 
 
Dear Ms. Xxxxxxxx:
 
Thank you, but I won't need copies of my own contest complaint nor another copy of the entry of dismissal.
 
However, there may be other items I need.  On June 19, 2009, Ms. Xxxx sent me copies of the contents of the file for case number 2009 ES 00174.  May I please have copies of any documents which were added to the court file after June 19th?
 
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
 
Sincerely,
 
xxxxx
 
 
 
Link

Dismissal of Will Contest Action & Note [Sep. 15th, 2009|01:55 pm]
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:49 PM
Subject: Dismissal of Will Contest Action & note
__________________________________________
 
 
 
 
                               IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
                                           PROBATE DIVISION
                                   XXXXXXXXX COUNTY, OHIO
 
 
[my name]

                Plaintiff 
                                                                                  CASE NO. 2009 CV 00375
 
vs
 
                           [my brother's name]                                    FILED
individually, and as Co-Executor of the
Estate of Gxxxxx X. XXXXXXX, deceased,                    SEP -8 2009
                                                                       
etal.                                                                           Txxxxxx X. XXXXXXXX, JUDGE
                                                                                       PROBATE COURT
                                                                                    xxxxxxxxxx COUNTY, OHIO
                Defendants
 
________________________________________________________________________________

 
 
                                       ENTRY OF DISMISSAL
 
 
                  This matter came on for consideration upon a complaint to initiate a will contest action filed by the Plaintiff,  [my name].

                  The Court hereby dismisses the complaint for failure of Plaintiff to comply with the Civil Rules governing complaints.

                   Costs assessed to Plaintiff.
 

                                                     ENTER AS OF THE DATE OF FILING:
 
 
                                                                                    (signed)
                                                                    __________________________________
                                                      TXXXXXXX X. XXXXXXXX, JUDGE
 
 
Copy to:
[my name] 
Axxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Jr.
Rxxx X. Xxxxxx
 
_________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
 
I hope the format of the letter above doesn't break up when I send this email.
 
This isn't a surprize, but I thought it would take a little longer.  It's interesting that it's been dismissed for form rather than for content, but I should have seen that coming, too.  I had hoped for the court's denial of my narrative of abuse by a U.S. security agency and by my brother.  At least my story is in the court files.  Or it should be, but who knows. 
 
In one of my earliest emails to the court clerk, I stated that I thought that I ultimately would have to contest the will and I asked for any material or forms which might assist me.  An assistant court clerk simply wrote back, "There are no forms for a will contest".  Well, you've seen in recent a recent email from that same assistant court clerk that she wouldn't answer my question about the hearing on exceptions to the inventory either.  There was no help for me from court staff.
 
I was unable to find any internet material on how to contest a will in Ohio.
 
And although I contacted every lawyer with an email address in that county seat of 15,000 people asking each if he/she would handle my demand for the four items which belonged to me and were at my mother's home when she died, only two lawyers responded affirmatively to me.  One asked for a $3,000 retainer.  The other wrote me that disingenuous letter starting, "I don't think we have a conflict . . . " because his children attend the same school as the niece and nephew of one of the estate's co-executors.
 
I replied positively and at length to both those lawyers, stating that I wished to engage their services, but neither responded to me.  I then sent them both follow-up emails saying that I hoped to hear from them, with no result.  Clearly neither lawyer had any intention of helping me, although I had not mentioned anything to them about my situation - only that I wanted my belongings returned to me.  The fix was in.
 
I will wait until my application to remove the bank savings account from the estate inventory is dismissed, and then I will again ask the court to act on my request for a ruling in the matter of the four items which belong to me.  I don't think that outcome will be a surprize either.  By the way, those two bank accounts really are mine.
 
Yesterday, before I went out, all the harbingers here in the building were ominous.  Therefore I drove further away and went to a different post office, a different grocery store, and a different drug store, and I returned home safely.  But last night and today, the noxious inhalant in the apartment is absolutely crippling.  I am sick and I'm afraid that Louie-Louie might die because of it.  I have to lie down now.
 
My brother and the other co-executor both attend regularly, and are active in, their respective churches.  I don't know what she actually believes, but my brother believes there's an afterlife.  I have the satisfaction of being sure that he absolutely knows that he will burn in hell forever because of what he has done to me.  He knows there is no forgiveness for some sins.
 
 
 

Link

Email to Etal: Submission to Probate Hearing; Phone harassment; Politics [Sep. 13th, 2009|04:45 pm]

 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
 
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 4:34 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Submission to Probate Hearing; Phone harassment; Politics
 
 
We're enjoying pleasant summer-like weather here.  Friday night at 11:30, two skunks once again had a screaming protracted fight on my patio, and my flashlight beam didn't deter them.
 
At the end of this note is my submission to the 9/25 probate court hearing on exceptions to the inventory of my mother's estate.  I will enclose a copy of the bank statement in my name with it.  When I go out on Monday I will mail it by Xpresspost. 
 
Each morning from 6 am until 8:30 or 9:00 (the activity stops when I get up), it sounds and feels as though an elephant tap dances non-stop directly over my head in the apartment above mine.  There is nothing normal about the noise and I can't think of any excuse for it.  Tuesday night through Wednesday I had a migraine headache, and someone clomped around over me every three hours on schedule all night long.  The beginning of the week also featured heavy equipment noise from the lane.  However, I'm fairly talented at screening out unwanted sounds, but they bother poor Louie-Louie.  And what more can I write about the noxious inhalant?  It's enough to say that it continues unabated.
 
Friday morning there was overdone and highly unusual lulling activity by Jxxx Xxxxxxx in 20x and Cxxxx XxXxxxxx in 20x.  I was waiting to see what would happen. Then there were a succession of hang-ups on my answering machine, and finally "Beverly" left a message.  "Hi, I'm just calling to see how you are.  I hope that's all right.  I'm just trying to stay in touch.  I hope you're okay."  I don't know any Beverlys, and this one had a smarmy voice.  Of course it could have been a wrong number (she didn't say my name), but I don't  believe that it was. 
 
Let me see if I can explain.  Since the beginning of their harassment against me, police have tried to get me to call phone numbers, return messages, etc., that were strange.  Most recently I wrote about a  message from City Hall supposedly returning my original call (I hadn't made one) and asking me to phone back.  There are many such instances in malcanada's LiveJournal and I am too careful to ever phone any suspicious number because I think I would be accused of threatening someone or of committing some other criminal act.
 
During early times when the phone calls were particularly annoying, I used to press *69 to obtain the number of the caller.  I stopped doing that because I simply didn't care who was being used to bother me.  I even stopped writing to you about phone calls unless there was something egregious about them - like the mentioned above City Hall caller from permits and licenses after 10x's Bxxxxxx Xxxxxx and I had discussed that a neighbor was operating a business in the lane.
 
There are ordinary messages left by telemarketers, of course, and even a real rare message for me.  I'm not writing about those.  But there are another whole class of hang-ups on the machine and messages which occur frequently.  They usually happen when I walk near the phone, as though police hope I would absent-mindedly answer (I have learned to let every call go to the machine).  Sometimes when I stay near the phone, there are five or six hang-ups in quick succession on the answering machine, as though police are goading me to call *69.  That was happening Friday morning immediately before "Beverly" left her message.  Did police hope that I would obtain her number and phone her back?
  
Then there are strange messages, or incomplete messages from individuals, and often they leave a number.  For any given instance, there could be a logical explanation.  But there is a pattern here, and it happens far too often (almost daily) for it to be chance.  I will never call *69 again in response to these minor annoyances.  Police agencies have the latest technology and who knows what incriminating phone number could be connected to mine.  And of course I will not return a call to a stranger.
 
Trixie's grown-up kitten stops by to visit several mornings a week.  I'm calling him Jinx because he showed up again like a bad penny after I had been assuring myself that Trixie's babies had all gone to good homes.  Trixie has longish fur, especially on her tail, and she works hard at keeping herself well-groomed.  But Jinx has very long fur all over and he can't groom himself well enough.  He has matted fur, poor guy.  (Cary Grant used to let me comb him and trim him with scissors when he visited on the patio.)  Siamese Mike and Louie-Louie accept Jinx good-naturedly when he arrives.
 
When the weather is cooler, I will take several non-rainy days to work on my plants.  If the large dead ones are dry enough, perhaps I can cut and break off all the branches and get them into garbage bags.  The patio fences and decks continue to deteriorate.  This morning I trimmed the large rose bush, which isn't healthy really, but it doesn't seem to be dying like my other plants.
 
The raccoon family comes around occasionally.  Two of the babies were here last night.  They look mostly grown up now, but when their mother came to get them with a low-pitched trilling noise, they ran to her to have their faces licked like little babies and docilely left with her.
 
Yesterday I read in the NYTimes that all of the potato fields on Long Island have been converted to vineyards.  (For you Canadians - Maine, Long Island, and Idaho were always famous for their potatoes.)  Do you remember my complaint that the orchards in the Canadian Okanagan have been dug out and replaced with vineyards? 
 
It's all so ridiculous.  While the middle class is being wiped out by massive credit card debt, government deregulation, astronomical health care costs, the disappearance of full-time jobs, and tax reductions for the truly rich, every white collar worker on the continent goes on using his/her credit cards to prove that he/she is a wine and fine food connoisseur, while constantly talking, twittering and photoing on a cell phone, as he/she sips a $5 non-fat vanilla/mocha latte with sprinkles.  Well, I suppose that all the technology for constant non-thinking social networking, along with letting workers pretend that they are able to enjoy the same luxuries as the rich, are simply the current opiates of the people.  The ruling class knows its business.
 
I do feel angry when I read all the moronic local newspaper reviews of wine and restaurants, though.  It's the same in all North American cities.  People rush out and stand in line to get into a well-reviewed restaurant that will disappear within a year and probably doesn't even have linen tablecloths.  They use their credit cards to pay for an overpriced meal, and think that they are enjoying haute cuisine because some kid in the kitchen put pureed apricots on their meat.  But actually, I like restaurants and there are lots of good, reasonably priced ones around, especially if one enjoys ethnic food.  I particularly like Chinese and Japanese cuisine.
 
Obama's wimp-out on the public component of healthcare is complete now.  I don't think he really cares.  He puts a progressive image out there, but the policies don't seem to actually be important to him.  I suspect that all he wants - all he's willing to work at - is his own image as the man-of-reason negotiator who never loses his cool and stands above any controversy.  I'm amazed that the right wing and all those tea party people think that he's such a scary leftist.
 
Tomorrow I have errands and food shopping to do in the community, and I will take my submission for probate court to the post office.  What will happen this time?  Will rude people push and shove and delay me in the supermarket?  Will a sleazy younger man try to pick me up?  Will my car develop mysterious problems?  Will I be involved in an accident?  Stay tuned.
 
Please save my journal.    Wish me luck.
 
 
______________________________________________

Xxxxxxxx County Probate Court

Court House

xxx xxxxxx Street

Xxxxxxx, Ohio xxxxx

 

Txxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, Judge

 

In the matter of the Estate of Gxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx

Case No: 2009 ES 00XXX

 

 

A submission to the Hearing on Exceptions to the Inventory

To be held on September 25, 2009

 


 

 

(My name & address here)

 

September 14, 2009

 

____________________________________

 

This is my submission to the September 25, 2009 hearing on exceptions to the inventory of the estate of Gxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx.

I believe that Peoples Bank savings account number x00x0x0xx0 is my personal property and should be excluded from the estate inventory. On two separate occasions a number of years ago, I attended Peoples Bank of Xxxxxxx, Ohio, with my mother, Gxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, in order that she might add my name as a co-owner to three of her bank accounts. I do not remember the dates of those bank visits.

However, I do remember that my name was affixed as a co-owner to both a Peoples Bank checking account and to a savings account, and I was required to sign cards so that my signature could be kept on file by the bank. On the other bank visit, my mother placed a certificate of deposit or term deposit valued at more than $60,000 in trust for me.

I did not know what had become of those three bank accounts in the last several years, and I did not immediately associate them with any of the items appearing on the inventory of the estate of Gxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx.

Then, on August 4, 2009, one of the co-executors of my mother’s estate, Rxxx X. Xxxxxxx, mailed me a package of material about the public auction of my mother’s personal possessions. Included was a bank statement, dated April 3, 2009, from the Peoples Bank for savings account number x00x0x0xx0. The savings account is the primary account on the statement, but also listed is an associated checking account number 0xxx1xx. That bank statement for those two accounts was addressed to me.

The bank statement which Ms. Xxxxxxx sent me, a copy of which is attached, was addressed to: 

Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx or     [my mother's name]  
Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx         [my name]
XXX NW Xxxxxxx Ave. 
PO Box XXX
Xxxxxxxxx, XX xxxxxx        

The address appearing on the statement belongs to my brother, Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, the other co-executor of the estate. After my mother’s death, the bank statements should have been sent to me at my Canadian address because I am the sole owner of that savings and checking account. I do not know why the bank erroneously changed the account address to that of my brother rather than to mine.

Now I also question whether the Peoples Bank certificate of deposit number x00x0xxx9x on the schedule of assets is the account which my mother had placed in trust for me, but I do not know how to ascertain that.

The savings account listed on the estate inventory is my personal property and I wish it to be returned to me.

I hereby request that the court rule that Peoples Bank account number x00x0x0xx0 is an exception to the inventory of the estate of Gxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx.

 

(signature & date)

 

 
Link

Email to Etal: Pick-up attempt; Hard hat/truck provocation; "Good" people; Birthday [Sep. 5th, 2009|04:31 pm]

 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Pick-up attempt; Hard hat/truck provocation; "Good" people; Birthday
 
 
 
Thursday was my birthday.  I think I've told you before that I don't feel any different than I did was I was nineteen.  My body treacherously aged around me and imprisoned me.  I guess everyone feels like that.  When my father was hospitalized, he and I walked around the corridor a bit and he caught sight of himself in a mirror and exclaimed jokingly, "Who is that old man?".  I was sure, though, that he had been truly startled at the sight of himself, old and gray (and pale and thin because he had had a stroke).  Do you know the rhyme - "Minutes trudge, hours run, years fly, decades stun"? 
 
I treated myself well on my birthday as I always do on holidays and I enjoyed it.  I bought frozen lobster meat and sauteed it with olive oil, garlic, and herbs.  I also had some really wonderful pastry (I froze a few pieces for Labor Day) along with a lot of luscious fruit.  I have pecan ice cream and other goodies, too.  And I purchased a large piece of salmon to bake on Monday, but I still haven't cooked a whole fish yet this summer. 
 
Monday a policeman tried to pick me up in the XXX supermarket on Xxxx Street and I was offended.  Are they nuts?  Do they really think that I would befriend a stranger?  And he was sleazy and inappropriately young.  I recognized him from the dim past as well, and I wondered if he were the cop who was hanging around in my apartment hallway one morning while I was still living in the Xxxx Xxx (I had to phone the building manager to get rid of him).  That guy was wearing a yellow-tan leather jacket.  This man looked as though he too has one of those in his closet at home.  What would happen if I were stupid and tasteless enough to allow one of these people into my apartment?
 
When I came home that day, Xxxxx-Next-Door was washing a van outside on the street.  I was pleasant and asked him, because there is a for sale sign on the lawn, who is selling his/her apartment.  He said Oxxx Xxxxxxx has put 30x on the market.  Oxxx has been involved in several entrapment attempts and so has his Asian wife who tried to cause me to react negatively (and I thought police hoped in a racist way) when she sneeringly asked me if she could take over my underground parking space.
 
Then on Tuesday, Xxxxx-Next-Door went out on his patio and started to yell because a skunk had been here digging in both our planters.  I knew police hoped that I would become involved in a conversation with him, but I ignored his outburst because it felt phoney and trap-like.  He was out there again on either Wednesday or Thursday trying to get my attention, but I thought it wise to stay away from him.  Later on Wednesday while I was sitting in the rocker at the open patio door, a woman showed up at my fence and began to hang around while staring at me.  I never looked at her, but it could have been Cxxxx XxXxxxx who is a red flag for me.  I went into the kitchen.  I won't be drawn into an argument with anyone, despite the fact that police continually try to set me up by inundating me with sickening noxious inhalant.
 
Yesterday, Friday, was interesting.  Around 1 pm, a flat bed truck with a trenching attachment came into the lane and raced its roaring engine and drove back and forward a half dozen times in order to park flush with our lane fence just at my sliding door.  Once before a trench had been dug along my fence with dreadful noise, and then it was simply filled in again - that was an effort to get me into a fighting mood.  
 
I was thinking how ridiculous it was - to start a major job three and half hours before quitting time on the Friday of a three day weekend.  The noxious inhalant, both the CVA stuff and the allergens, had been extremely heavy all week and I knew that the truck was here to get a rise out of me.  I stayed in the apartment.  There are only a few feet between my patio fence and the property line lane fence. A man in a hard hat climbed onto the truck bed (he was above the fences, clearly visible to me, and quite close) and stood there looking into my apartment.
 
I knew then that police hoped that I would talk to him.  Of course I didn't do so.  He stayed up there for a while, and finally gave up and disappeared.  By 1:30, he had removed his hard hat and drove the truck away without doing anything.  The police plan to entrap me had failed.  In a few minutes, Xxxxx-Next-Door (who had been silently lurking in his apartment all day) appeared on his patio, watered his plants, and then went out.  I suppose that he would have been a witness to any verbal exchange between me and the hard hat guy.  It doesn't matter that I would never say anything incriminating myself, they would simply lie about what I said if they were given the opportunity.
 
The pneumatic closer on the rear entrance has been disconnected so that the door slams violently and shakes my bedroom wall every time someone goes in or out. 
 
Since there is no respite from the noxious inhalant, I am actually getting used to it.  It must be damaging though, and I do think that the RCMP and local police are capable of causing me to suffer a CVA.  Louie-Louie has vomited some nights which is when the inhalant seems strongest.  I was once asked how I can be so phlegmatic about discussing the noxious inhalant.  Do I have a choice?  People who know about the inhalant and what is being done to me pretend not to know about it.  It's too big a notion.  Too much like Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union.  Too horrible.  People don't want to admit that the RCMP would or could  do that in Canada no matter what happens to me.  So I will just go on dispassionately recording the illegal methods that RCMP and local police use against me.  Some day the truth will come out, although that may happen too late to do me any good. 
 
“We will have to repent in this generation not merely for the hateful words and actions of the bad people but for the appalling silence of the good people.”   I would have put good in quotes.
 
The cat who recently appeared on the grounds next door, is one of Trixie's black and white kittens.  On Tuesday I had a migraine headache, and I got up and opened the sliding door and then lay on the sofa.  That feral cat came into the apartment and climbed up very gently and lay on my stomach just as he used to do when he was a tiny kitten.  He didn't want any food, he was just visiting as he did as a baby.  He doesn't come around much though - so far it's been once a week.
 
I am so disgusted with the healthcare debate in the U.S. that I don't even want to write about it.  It seems that the legislative process has been hijacked by crazy people.  And Obama has been cowardly.  I wonder if the country can ever get back on track.
 
Here in Canada full-time jobs are disappearing at an alarming rate, but the various levels of government and their tame media keep spouting about the recession being over because part-time jobs were created in August and because the housing market is on the rise.  I think the housing market is showing improvement because most people believe the media's lies and have no idea that economic conditions are still so bad.  Our banks are relatively healthy though, unlike those in the U.S.
 
There was a huge thunderstorm in the wee hours of Thursday.  Since then we've had cloudy/sunny days with some showers.  I like this weather.  It rained a bit earlier today, but now the sun is trying to come out.  I usually enjoy September and October.  Canada has had a forecast for a mild winter.
 
Please save my journal.    Wish me luck.
 
 
 
Link

Email to Etal: Ct.Hearing 9/25; Ct.Clerk won't advise; ACLU ; Useless internet advice [Aug. 29th, 2009|03:33 pm]
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 3:20 PM
Subject: Email to Etal: Ct.Hearing 9/25; Ct.Clerk won't advise; A C L U ; Useless internet advice

 
 
 
I received a notice from the probate court that there will be a hearing on my exception to the inventory on September 25th.  That concerns the savings account which may belong to me.  I emailed the court clerk for advice, but she refused to help and told me to contact a lawyer.  I tried using a legal website, but that lawyer told me to consult a local lawyer or ask the court clerk.  Do you remember that before I ever contacted the court, I emailed all the lawyers I could find in my mother's town?  No one would help me, although I only wrote about probate and did not mention harassment by a U.S. security agency.  I think in that town, the fix is in.
 
So I researched the state legal code as best I can on the internet.  Section 21.1516 directs that the judge may call sworn testimony at the hearing, but since it's not required, I don't have to be there in person.   All I can offer the court, anyway, is the copy of the savings account bank statement which is addressed to me.  I will send the bank statement with  another personal letter of my concerns by special mail before the hearing.  No matter what, the court will rule against me, of course.
 
The probate court has not acknowledged my filed request for the judge to rule on my claim against the estate for my four items of personal property which were at my mother's home.  I will pursue that after the hearing on the inventory.
 
I also emailed the state American Civil Liberties Union office.  I don't want help with probate court, but I do want someone to take seriously my complaint about harassment by a U.S. security agency.  Alas, it doesn't seem likely that there will be any assistance from the too busy ACLU.  Their email to me is below along with those from the court clerk and the internet legal advice guy.
 
When I went shopping this week, there was a peculiar incident.  I parked at the XXX supermarket and then first went into the drugstore.  As soon as I emerged from my car, a man who looked like a cop appeared.  He stood around watching me.  When I came out of the drugstore, he was standing with two other men.  I went to put my purchases in the trunk of my car, and then I turned toward the grocery store.  All three men looked at me, and one of them blurted out loudly, "That lady right there?", and he was immediately shushed.
 
Then my food shopping was supposed to frustrate me.  In every aisle I was bumped and delayed and otherwise annoyed by extremely rude people.  When I was ready to drive away, a man and an old woman leaned on the hood of my car and made me wait.  I was expecting some sort of entrapment when I unloaded the car in front of this building.  When I got to this front door while juggling a number of grocery bags, a tall nicely-spoken women with a German shepherd on a leash opened the door.
 
I know the dog.  She is out on the balcony above my patio all day every day.  She has had her vocal chords removed and can't make the slightest sound, despite being annoyed by cats, squirrels, raccoons, crows, and the forever barking dogs across the lane.  I felt sorry for the German shepherd when the weather was so hot. 
 
Do you remember that the man above me told me when he moved in that he lived with his wife and their dog?  Well, the first woman who loitered around upstairs was Chinese, and she had a fluffy little white dog, and they once emptied a vacuum bag of the dog's long white fur on my patio.  Then there was another young woman with punk hair who said "Like" every second word, and the Asian woman and the white dog were gone.  Now there is this tall woman purporting to live up there.  The man is hardly ever around, and I don't believe that they are a married couple.  I think someone sleeps in the living room.
 
Did police actually expect me to start an argument with the latest tall young woman?  I put down my packages and petted the dog.  She didn't offer much content in her speech, sort of waiting to see what I would say and do.  But she was smart and spoke well, and she's definitely a cut above the people who police usually try to sic on me.  It occurred to me that she might be an American, but I don't know.  I was pleasant.
 
Perhaps there was an attempt to draw me into an argument on Tuesday.  The noxious inhalant is always present, but that afternoon it was awful and my skin was bright red.  There was incredible noise from the apartments around me, and then after about two hours of annoyance, there was a shouted conversation at my patio.  I went into my kitchen to cook and turned on the loud exhaust fan and didn't hear a word, so if that was an entrapment attempt, it failed.
 
Louie-Louie is not feeling well again.  I hope that the noxious inhalant will not cause his death as it did with poor Chuck and Millie.  And don't forget that Cary Grant was poisoned and died.  There has been a new cat around several times lately, and I'm sure that it is one of Trixie's kittens grown up.  It has long black and white fur and the same markings as one of the kittens that were taken away by the cat rescue people, XXXRA.  That organization has no shelter and it neuters cats and simply returns them to the haunts where they were captured.  Louie, Mike, and even Trixie don't allow other cats stay on our patio, but they were friendly to this new guy and let him lounge about and eat some of Trixie's food.  He must smell like family.
 
It occurred to me that I didn't write that my mother's expensive jewellery was not sold at the public auction.  Well, as I did tell you, anything that was most valuable and portable would have been taken home by my brother. 
 
I wonder if my application to contest my mother's will simply will be dismissed out of hand, or if I will have to go through some process.  I'm sure that would be much more onerous than writing a letter.  Of course, the U.S. security agency will insure that there is no legal help available to me if there is process.
 
The weather here has been lovely, but the days are noticeably shorter with the sun setting around 8:05.  There is ear-splitting noise from the lane right now - some sort of heavy machinery.  Perhaps it will be followed up by an entrapment attempt.  Every window and door on the south side of the building are closed and dark except for mine.
 
Please save my journal.    Wish me luck.
 
 
 
__________________________________________

----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 5:17 PM
To: American Civil Liberties Union
Subject: Harassment by U.S. security agency; Creating a record

Sorry, but I couldn't figure out how to make this understandable on your complaint form.  This is a complaint about a U.S. security agency harrassing me and my American family in XXXXX.

I am a U.S. citizen living in Canada since 1968.  I worked for the City of Xxxxxxx, and while looking for a means of firing me, the Xxxxxxx Police and a city bureaucrat placed me under illegal surveillance in both my home and office.  I was told about the surveillance, I complained, and my boss was fired.  Then city police spent six weeks destroying my reputation before I was fired from my position.  Police disliked me because in my previous employment I had created and managed, for 17 years, a defense-oriented court project to assist mentally disordered offenders.

Local police then involved the RCMP and a U.S. security agency in destroying every aspect of my life.  A U.S. security agent was in touch with my American brother for years, and he passed on lies about me to my aged mother in Xxxxxx, Xxxxx.  I was alienated from all of my family, but especially from my mother and my dear aunt.  Neither my mother nor my brother would name the U.S. security agency.

I have complained to the appropriate commissions, etc., in Canada about the RCMP and Xxxxxx Police without result.  Complaints to U.S. politicians have gone unanswered.  I want my life back.  Casting around for some action to take, I am trying to contest my mother's will which my brother had her change (and disinherit me) last December, and then she died in March, 2009.  Several months ago, I emailed all the lawyers I could find in Xxxxxx asking for assistance with an estate problem but no one would help me, despite the fact that I did not mention harassment or the U.S. security agency.

This is not about money for me, and I don't expect to get a cent.  But I thought that writing out the whole story for Xxxxxxxx County Probate Court was one means of creating a written record of what has been done to me by the U.S. security agency.  My submission is attached. 

The U.S. security agency and the RCMP have effectively isolated me.  I have no allies.

Is there an ACLU lawyer in Xxxxx?  Can the ACLU offer me any advice or support?  Anything you can do to assist me would be greatly appreciated.  I hope you have time to read my story below.

Sincerely,

xxxxx            (My submission to contest the will was added to this email.)

___________________________________________________________________________ 

 
----- Original Message -----
From: ACLU
To: xxxxx
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 7:37 AM
Subject: RE: Harassment by U.S. security agency; Creating a record

 

Dear Friend,

Thank you for your correspondence requesting legal help.  We receive up to 150 inquiries each week.  Unfortunately, we cannot research individual legal matters, offer legal advice, or provide attorney referrals, due to our small staff and limited funding.  We can accept only a few cases each year.

If you believe that your rights have been violated, we encourage you to contact a private attorney at once – do not wait to hear from us!

Only a lawyer who has taken the time to become fully aware of the facts in a given case can provide you with sound legal advice. The law imposes time limits on most actions to vindicate your rights, so it is important to act quickly. 

You can contact your local bar association to find out if they offer a lawyer referral service.  Your local legal aid society may also be able to help you get a lawyer.

The reference department of your public library can help you find answers to basic legal questions.

Additionally, the ACLU web sites, www.aclu.org provide a wealth of information on civil liberties issues.

We have retained your correspondence, and it will be reviewed by our legal staff.  We will contact you only if we can help you.  Again, please contact a private attorney immediately if you feel your rights have been violated.

We wish you much luck.

Sincerely,
Intake Department

ACLU of Xxxxx

________________________________________________________________________

From: xxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 4:29 PM
To: probate@xxxxxxxgov.org
Subject: 2009 ES00xxx - Hearing on Exception to Inventory

Dear Ms. Xxxxxx,

Today I received the notice of the September 25th hearing on the exception to the inventory of my mother's estate.

Can you tell me what is required of me in regard to the hearing?

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

xxxxx

__________________________________________

 
From: probate court 
To: xxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 2:01 PM
Subject: RE: 2009 ES00xxx - Hearing on Exception to Inventory

Dear Ms. xxxxx:

You will need to contact an attorney to advise you on the subject matter you are inquiring about.

Sincerely,

xxx xxxxxxx

Deputy Clerk

 


 

Asked on 8/26/2009
Ohio Probate Court: I have filed an exception to the inventory. Hearing is set 9/25. Do I have to be there in person? Can I write a letter?
 

Courts differ on this.  It would be best to consult with either a local attorney, or try speaking to the court clerk for that information.

  • Answered on 8/27/2009                                                          
 
 
Link

Email to Etal: Document to contest the will [Aug. 23rd, 2009|05:46 pm]

 

August 23, 2009

 

Court House

Xxxxxxx, Ohio 45750

Judge Txxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx

 

In the matter of the Estate of Gxxxxx X. XXXXXXX

Case number: 2009 - XX - 00xxxx

 

I hereby initiate a will contest action

 

[Name & Address]

 

_____________________________

 

During the last eight years of the life of my mother, Gxxxxx X. XXXXXXX, my brother and co-executor of her estate, Axxxxx X. XXXXXXX, did on a habitual basis, wilfully and maliciously slander my reputation to my mother in order to deprive me of her affection and to prevent me from benefiting from her estate. By repeating lies about me my brother did finally influence my mother to write a new will on December 17, 2008, which excluded me from inheriting part of her estate.

I therefore request that the court set aside that section of the last will and testament of Gxxxxx X. XXXXXXX which bequeaths fifty per cent (50%) of her estate to Axxxxx X. XXXXXXX [my brother]; and that the court redirect half of that amount, twenty-five per cent (25%) of the estate of Gxxxxx X.  XXXXXXX to me, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx.

 

 

Explanation

In the year 2000, my aunt (and my mother’s only sibling) added my name as a co-owner of her valuable house in New York City. Previously my mother had added my name as co-owner of her checking, and I think her savings, bank accounts, and she had placed a certificate of deposit worth more than $60,000 in trust for me.

My brother was displeased with these actions of both my mother and my aunt, and events transpired which allowed him to use slander to prevent me from inheriting money or property from either my aunt or my mother. For most of my adult life, my brother, who is politically conservative, has disapproved of my liberal beliefs and of the fact that I have lived in Canada for many years.

I had been employed by the City of Xxxxxxxxx as the director of a high profile, politically sensitive community center in the xxxxxxx neighborhood in Canada. The civically active, powerful woman who was living with my ex-husband began a campaign to remove me from my position, but I was a competent and well-liked director. That woman then accused me of providing a community organization that was her rival with sensitive city material, which was not true. However in a severe ethical lapse, a police inspector and the City’s Director of Community Services arranged for illegal police surveillance at my home and office to discern whether I was releasing information which should be confidential. Other city employees told me about the cameras and listening devices, and I complained to the Director of Community Services on the telephone, a call which was heard by the City Manager. The Director of Community Services had his employment terminated that same day.

The city continued my employment for another six weeks and then fired me. During that six week period, without my knowledge, city police “investigated” me and ruined my reputation with everyone I had every known in order to protect themselves. They said that I had lied and accused the Director of Community Services of sexual harassment which resulted in his dismissal - this was not true. Police told people that I was a violent person, also not true. They said I was sexually promiscuous, which was a ridiculous lie. Police unearthed three former employees of mine from a court project I had managed for seventeen years. These three, who had initiated a failed union grievance against me, were somehow persuaded (two are now probation officers and one is an education director at court) by police to say dreadful and untrue things about me which the city police then repeated to everyone they contacted and re-contacted about me.

At that time I had no knowledge of how badly police were damaging my reputation and I simply sued the city for unlawful dismissal, without mentioning the illegal police surveillance, and settled out of court for a run-of-the-mill settlement.  Gradually, the truth about the police bashing of my reputation emerged, and I found myself to be isolated. Then local police involved the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in an effort to drive me from Canada, so that I would not be available to testify about their actions. Part of that effort centered upon using a U.S. security agency to destroy my credibility with my American family and to help remove me from this city where I have lived and prospered for many years.

None of the calumnies presented about me by Xxxxxxxx Police, the RCMP, or the U.S. security agency has even the slightest basis in fact, and all were invented simply as a means to cover-up the City’s activity in placing me under illegal camera, microphone, telephone, and computer surveillance in both my home and office because of an employment matter.

At this point, my brother, Axxxxx X. XXXXXXX, became involved. He was approached by a U.S. security agency which was acting as an ally of the RCMP, and he seized the opportunity to poison my mother’s mind against me. My brother is an well educated professional, an author, a man who has lived in a half dozen different regions of the country, and he has traveled widely. He has a more sophisticated worldview than my mother and he knew that the information about me from the security agency was untrue. Much of it was ridiculous, yet he repeated it all to my mother, week after week for a number of years, fully realizing that she would accept it as incontrovertible simply because it came from a government agency.

If our situations had been reversed, I never would have worried my aged mother by repeating such scandalous material about one of her children. Certainly my brother did not warn me about the false, damaging, and fantastic statements being made about me. In his defense, my mother later informed me that the U.S. security agency had cautioned him not to discuss the matter with anyone. However, that did not stop my brother from repeating every slander about me to my mother during telephone conversations with her at least twice a week, and during some time periods on a daily basis.

This situation continued for several years. I spoke by phone to my mother for approximately two hours every Sunday morning, and I spoke to my aunt in New York on Saturdays for an hour or so.  During each conversation, I was asked by them (although my aunt seemed to obtain the erroneous information concerning me from my mother) about slanders against me which had come from my brother. I was fighting a losing battle for the affection of these two women. Later I realized that, because of my brother’s efforts, I was also losing the right to inherit money or property from either of them.

Both my mother and my aunt believed the untruths about me. My mother told me, “The government doesn’t lie, and Axxxxx [my brother] says it‘s all true.” She also told me that no government agent had approached her, and that all her information arrived through my brother. She also said it was very unfair that I had put my brother in such an embarrassing position by my being the subject of an investigation.

In the early stages of the harassment against me, much of what my brother said about me to my mother was petty, but it was carefully designed to play into prejudices already held by her. When I once told my mother that I didn’t feel well, she replied that I was sick because there was dust under the headboard of my bed (she seemed to think it permissible that police illegally enter my home to inspect the level of my housekeeping and then tell my brother who would report to her regularly). She told me when my curtains needed to be dry cleaned. She informed me when my carpet needed to be shampooed. This was an easy and sure way for my brother to attack me. My mother, who always said, “Cleanliness is next to Godliness”, kept a spotlessly clean home, shining with polish and order. I could not live up to her housekeeping standards while working all my life.

My mother always thought that it was not respectable for me to be divorced, and that I had done my son an injustice by raising him without a live-in father. She did not approve when I had reported to her in the distant past that I had dated several men. Therefore she was predisposed to believe tales from my brother, supposedly revealed by the U.S. Security Agency, that I was sexually promiscuous and that I had designs on the husbands of my friends and other men I knew casually. All of it was insulting nonsense, but my brother repeated it to my mother.

In the 1970’s I had volunteered for one of the three major Canadian political parties, The New Democratic Party, a group which champions healthcare, daycare, pharmacare, improved education, etc. The U.S. security agency told my brother, who told my mother, who told my aunt, that I consorted with Communists and other assorted radicals. None of that was true, but my mother accepted my brother‘s word as gospel and didn‘t accept my denials. My brother, knowing me, couldn’t have believed any of this.

Then there were lies about the Kennedy family. I met John Kennedy and Robert Kennedy. I lived in Boston during 1962 and 1963. I used to vacation on Cape Cod in the early 1960‘s. But those three statements could be made about tens of thousands of people. When my son resided in New England as a young adult, he worked for the Democratic Party and met other members of the Kennedy family.

This extremely tenuous and innocuous connection with the Kennedys was parlayed by the U.S. security agency into the suggestion that I had an affair with President Kennedy. Later, they stretched it to something more sinister and stated that I speak Spanish (no, I just studied it in school) and that I had Cuban connections (I have never personally known a Cuban), and that I have information about the Kennedy assassination. My mother swallowed all of it, and told me that my brother said the U.S. agency had “a good case” against me.

Meanwhile, the RCMP and local police were trying to drive me out of my condominium home with the knowledge of my family in the U.S. My condominium neighbors were involved by local police and the RCMP and told that I am a dangerous person. In fact, I live quietly with two cats and we are mostly silent (I am a voracious reader and a patio gardener). I have no company because police have driven off my former friends.

My brother repeatedly suggested to my mother that I was a slob and not a respectable enough person to be allowed to continue to live here. My mother told me that I would be evicted because I’m too poor a housekeeper (actually my standards are normal), and because I was feeding peanuts to a friendly squirrel. On one occasion she knew in advance from my brother that my neighbors intended to ply me with wine (I don’t drink, though) at a backyard barbecue and to start an argument with me in an attempt to evict me. She seemed to think that I deserved to be evicted because my brother told her so.

Then, just before a scheduled condominium general meeting here, my aunt accidentally revealed to me on the phone that my neighbors would pass a resolution at the meeting to remove my large patio and make it part of the back yard in another attempt to drive me from the building. And they hoped that I could be drawn into an argument at the meeting. I made it clear to the president of the condominium council that this was a serious matter since my family in the U.S. knew about it in advance, and their plan was postponed.

Shortly afterward the U.S. security agency suggested that my brother ask my mother if I could go to live with her in Ohio. My brother knew that was not a possibility which either my mother or I would entertain. He was simply making mischief by speaking to my mother about it. I was amazed when my mother phoned me in an agitated state to tell me that I could not live with her and that she couldn’t support me (my mother always assumed that I had no income and no money). Obviously police were continuing their attempt to get me away from here so that I could never testify against them, but all they had done was to give my brother another wedge to drive between my mother and me.

In 2002 I flew to Ohio to celebrate my mother’s 90th birthday with her. The other residents in her building who used to hug and kiss me when I visited, would not look at me and tried to run away when I approached. My bother had warned my mother that I might make contact with “terrorists” while I was there, so she would not allow me to suggest any day trips. I wanted to drive up to Amish country to look at quilts, but she would not go because my brother had warned her that I had traitorous plans. We mostly ate in restaurants, went for little drives in the country, and did some shopping. When we visited the Sxxxx/ Rxxxxxx/ Txxxxx/ Bxxxx family who had been so kind to my mother, the atmosphere was strained and, although I was sure that my mother had passed on all the slander and lies from my brother, I also wondered if they had been contacted directly by the U.S. security agency.

Meantime, here at home, my neighbors continued their campaign against me. When I couldn’t be enticed into arguments, they began to falsely overcharge me thousands of dollars for assessments and other fees at the behest of the RCMP. I wanted to move away from the city and to the suburbs and a different municipality, but I knew that the RCMP would interfere if I tried to sell this apartment and to simultaneously buy another. I feared that I would wind up homeless in the shuffle. Therefore I asked my mother to lend me $40,000 to combine with my savings, so that I could buy and move into a new apartment before selling this one. She refused and said that my brother told her that I would not pay her back, that I would be going to jail, and that I had no financial prospects (I would have repaid her out the money received from the sale of this apartment which is assessed at $214,400 and carries only a $27,000 mortgage).

My mother told me that my brother said that I should go to live with my aunt in New York City as an unpaid maid/nurse, and stop trying to maintain a condo apartment. This was an attempt by my brother to create more dissension . My mother said that my brother told her that I could not afford or maintain a condo (obviously that’s not true), and that the NYC arrangement would be best for the entire family (and no doubt it would please xxxxxxxx Police and the RCMP). I flatly refused. My aunt was always very kind to me until my brother alienated her from me, and I am deeply grateful to her and affectionate toward her, but I do not intend to allow the RCMP and other police agencies to drive me away from Canada and its public health plan.

Around this time I developed an atypical pneumonia, and while treating it, a physician sent me for other medical tests. I was annoyed to find out that my brother had told my mother the result of an ultrasound examination before I had heard it from the doctor. My mother told me, “Axxxxx [my brother] says your house is filthy and you wouldn’t be sick if you were cleaner”.

From this time, the attitudes toward me of my mother and my aunt became even more remote and unkind. Once my mother called me on an unusual day at an unusual time to ask me how I thought I’d do in prison. On two occasions she phoned me in a lulling mode about unimportant matters or just to chat immediately before entrapment attempts were carried out by local police. (Local police and the RCMP frequently tried unsuccessfully to entrap me criminally in public in order to destroy my credibility.) Later I told her that I knew my brother, on behalf of the U.S. security agency, had asked her to lull me so I would go unsuspecting into those two traps, and she didn’t deny it. She said, “Don‘t blame Axxxxx. It‘s all your fault, with that life you‘ve led, that he had to be involved.”

Sometime after that, I stopped phoning my mother and my aunt on weekends. The pain of the continuous accusations of my mother, all second-hand from my brother, made it impossible for me to listen to insults week after week. Then I received a letter from my aunt’s lawyer stating that she wanted me to sign the enclosed papers which would remove my name from her house title deed, and I knew that my brother’s lies about me had caused this development. I replied that I wanted to be paid $40,000 before signing the papers so that I could move, and that I would repay it as soon as I sold this apartment. I heard nothing back. Then another NYC lawyer contacted me, listened to my demand, and faded away. Thirdly, my aunt’s usual lawyer tried again with the same result. I feel certain that eventually some application was made in a New York court which removed my name from the house title, but no one has ever notified me of such an action.

From then on, the only contacts I had with my mother were nasty messages she left on my answering machine. They were all similar. She said that I didn’t care about my aunt or I would go and live with her and take care of her; and that I must sign over the NYC house title immediately and stop asking for money to move within Canada. She said that Axxxxx [my brother] had told her “what kind of life” I had led and that what was happening to me was “good enough” for me. On several occasions she told the machine that she had information that I would very soon be going to jail, and added, “Then we‘ll see what happens to your apartment and to your cats“.

No one notified me while my mother was in her last illness. Two days after she died, my son (also estranged from me by the RCMP) left a three line message on my answering machine that my mother had died and would be buried four days hence. I think it is significant that although the situation between us which was caused and perpetuated by my brother had gone on for a number of years, my mother did not make a new will until December 17, 2008. Despite my brother’s best efforts, my mother was 96 years old, in failed health and facing her death before she was willing to disinherit me.

My mother’s home was full of my personal possessions. As I wrote in my claim against the estate, throughout my life I was afraid that if I ever forced the question of my taking my belongings to Canada, that it would rupture my relationship with my mother.

After my mother’s death, my brother’s only contact with me was to send me a waiver which would abrogate my rights in regard to my mother’s estate. Originally all I asked for was four possessions of mine which were particularly dear to me. The co-executors of the estate, my brother and Rxxx Xxxxxxx, have denied my claim even though my brother and everyone in the family knew that those four items were mine. Indeed, one of the items has been sold at public auction. I have asked the court to render a decision in regard to the ownership of those four items.

Because my brother had succeeded in causing so much anger in my mother toward me, I expected that my mother had stricken my name from the ownership of a bank checking account, savings account, and certificate of deposit. However, co-executor Ms. Xxxxxxx sent me a package of material about the auction of my mother’s personal possessions, and among the papers was a bank statement for a savings account at Peoples Bank. That statement shows that the savings account belongs to Gxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx or xxxxx x. xxxxxx [my name]. Instead of the bank sending the monthly statements to me after my mother’s death, the statement address had been changed to my brother’s home in Xxxxxx under my name.

I am certainly the co-owner of my mother’s checking account. I have not been allowed to see bank statements for either the checking account or the savings account. Peoples Bank told me that the checking account is overdrawn, but the bank will not send me statements for it unless I pay them in advance $15 an hour for research and $1 per page for printing plus postage. I have filed an exception to the inventory for the savings account which I believe belongs to me. And now I wonder if the certificate of deposit which was held in trust for me is also one of the items on the estate’s list of assets. I ask the court to investigate the ownership of the certificate of deposit.

The Xxxxxxxx Police, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and the U.S. security agency have not arrested me, of course. I have done nothing either illegal or immoral and there can be no charges against me. Since I learned that I had been placed under illegal surveillance in my home and office by local police because of an employment matter, these three agencies have been dedicated to undermining my credibility, driving me from Canada, isolating me from family and friends, and destroying every aspect of my life. Their campaign was primarily a cover-up of the original illegal police activities, but as time goes on, and these three agencies in two countries commit more illegalities, there is a larger and larger component of spitefulness and hatefulness in their actions.

My medical and dental care have been interfered with by the RCMP to point that I almost was allowed to die, and I woke up on a respirator in hospital. When I attempted to join a church, a eucharistic minister chased me up the aisle and tried to pry a communion wafer out of my mouth. My cats have died mysteriously. My car has been sabotaged. I have been alienated from my family and from all of my former friends. My condominium neighbors still try to drive me out of my home, and false charges to me over the years now total about $25,000. The list of abuses and violations of my human rights and civil liberties goes on an on. I attach a letter to the Mayor of Xxxxxxxxx as general background information.

That my brother would take advantage of these terrible actions against me and use them to drive me from my mother’s life is unconscionable. None of the calumnies about me which my brother repeated to my mother was true. At no time was it possible that my brother, who is a more worldly person than my mother, actually believed the fantastic lies he was telling her about me. My brother, Axxxxxx X. XXXXXXX, maliciously entered into a campaign of slander against me with the intention of separating me from both my mother’s affection and from her estate.

I request that the court set aside the last will and testament of Gxxxxx X. XXXXXXX, and that I be granted twenty-five percent (25%) of her estate. Further I ask that my twenty-five percent (25%) be deducted from the fifty percent (50%) of the estate which the will directs to my brother, Axxxxx X. XXXXXXX.

 

[Signed]                                                    [Date]

 

 

 

 

Link

Email to Etal: Contesting the will; Email from bank [Aug. 21st, 2009|03:42 pm]

 
  
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx
 
To: The Etal Group
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 3:34 PM
Subject: Email to Etal:  Contesting the will;  Email from bank
 
 
 
I have written a document which will initiate a contest concerning my mother's will.  I'll edit it on Sunday and then mail it by "Xpresspost" early next week.  I'll email it to you and post it in my journal then.  I think it is important to leave this document as part of the paper trail describing what has been illegally done to me by Vancouver Police, the RCMP, and the U.S. security agency.
 
When the will contest document is filed, I will have three motions before the Xxxxxxxx County Probate Court.  They are:  an exception to the inventory (the savings account for which the statements are addressed to me); a request for a court ruling on my claim against the estate (the co-executors denied my claim for four items of my personal property which were at my mother's home); and my contesting the will because my brother willfully and maliciously, by repeating slander against me, influenced my mother to write a new will and to disinherit me (the current will is dated December, 2008).
 
Below is the last email received from my mother's bank.  Notice that the banker does not deny that my name is the addressee on the bank statements which are now being sent to my brother's home.  She claims that, "The savings account was linked to the joint checking account between yourself and Gxxxxx for statement printing purposes only and the title on the statement was indicative of the lead account (checking) and not of the savings account . . ."
 
Even she admits that I am owner of the checking account.  Yet she has refused to send me copies of the checking bank statements unless I pay, in advance, $15 per hour for research, $1 per sheet for copying, and postage.  The checking account is overdrawn and I am entitled to see how that happened.  However, I don't really expect co-operation from the bank.  And why does she refer to my mother by her first name?
 
It's cloudy today, but the weather this week has been warm, sunny, and quite nice.  I haven't seen the raccoon family, but one of the skunks was around last night.  Louie-Louie and Mike spend most of their time outside and are okay.  The noxious inhalant continues at a rate which is quite literally sickening.
 
Please save my journal.    Wish me luck.
 
 
______________________________________________________
 
----- Original Message -----
From: <Xxxxxxxxx@pexx.com>
To: xxxxx
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: Ownership of Peoples Bank accounts xxx1010xxx & xxx1077xxx

> Dear Ms. Xxxxxx,
>
> We have again checked the bank's records and the savings account in
> question was a solely owned account held in the name of Gxxxxx XxXxxx
> therefore Peoples Bank is not permitted to release account information to
> anyone other than the court appointed executors of the estate, any requests
> for information relating to this account should be directed to the name
> executor(s). The savings account was linked to the joint checking account
> between yourself and Gxxxxx for statement printing purposes only and the
> title on the statement was indicative of the lead account (checking) and
> not of the savings account which, again, was an account held solely in the
> name of Gxxxxx. The time deposit in question also is not entitled with your
> name and any requests for information relating to this account should be
> directed to the name executor(s).
>
> Please note I have placed Xs on portions of the account number in question
> for security purposes.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Sxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx
> Xxxxxx Manager
> Peoples Bank
> Ph. xxx xxx xxxx
> Fax. xxx xxx xxxx
Link

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Advertisement